From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_DKIM_INVALID shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239261F404 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 19:19:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730133AbeHMWCe (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Aug 2018 18:02:34 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com ([209.85.221.45]:41631 "EHLO mail-wr1-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729759AbeHMWCe (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Aug 2018 18:02:34 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id j5-v6so15179652wrr.8 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 12:19:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=zfhULkPZ4nTrjDTm5Iyml2nWoXOKCNKHVArgDt6ye+A=; b=VXRljaXGBa1cDoQ5WJpi34auAN+EyvbSOjwngUpg2YgaqGEmx08wERSiHXq9o6YxMT I94IfeZs+6ntrcj77pXnGFM8dBMFwSZ7XBFiEQCWWGvQ769AkeJ6wWXTC1gvjc4qTX4r ZfTrtP84LAl6+iZlToiytFqJ7iycNke91UTqzcjNLk7vbddYPzjxLRaZW5e+qj4WMKjk MqTg8ibyAqWxdwtwuHyf7sIodH3EcdRBonzPQuVGGW8MVinIszbqzHvxVXv25Z5UbyU8 9U4sruGtqtiqz50zLRJzkPKx3BBg+IOW8BuUQDw5bFwckTLibk/iwNvtFjgMFBwyi5mX F5Yw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=zfhULkPZ4nTrjDTm5Iyml2nWoXOKCNKHVArgDt6ye+A=; b=qKg+GVJgMV83jdizAqpfHWUE/NHBEoRDPglc3Pe82srP/UUx4nxdvJB/VcAvfgEPbO fE7cS8WCrvyREJIqtuAQGP6swJwMPXQsK5PLr2VTzaEVOgK5q4g9f4ma8B9n8VPRRwNY nhcTJgYjUk/wMtwUo1t0GpSTKz4kYrx2lTPJhQqjQI3/DhEdSkIDqf4BW9T52kUU81YQ 4i8/OlGFR20C6Ge/94ldxf6vjnvMcKtExIk9UKdHc74jLUiFp6+E3qUOIN0WM3mgOApM we5bPGZPgnuoXqlrNvrDAhumT1LLXL3gfDAhULAS2MvASBnnwienjqLJ7GswJBEeRcwr KrdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlF3cjYbWP4WbtS2qSN4ma6Obj2zbhHiDbfGePLYPKaXnPutoog1 nBfmy6aYuAP93khi3B0A1UwnpO4r X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPx6M0fm059Ttb2xyP2bl6sdp5d5wk411lQS/PpQMePjfhFD+oQVX/tcJ8350Re39Dh+esYMCw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e749:: with SMTP id c9-v6mr11202102wrn.143.1534187940168; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 12:19:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (168.50.187.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.187.50.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s10-v6sm25169238wmd.22.2018.08.13.12.18.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 13 Aug 2018 12:18:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Samuel Maftoul Cc: git Subject: Re: [RFC] implement branch.sort config option References: Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 12:18:59 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Samuel Maftoul's message of "Mon, 13 Aug 2018 11:56:58 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Samuel Maftoul writes: > I'm still missing tests and docs, but if agreed the feature is useful, > I will write them. I personally think branch.sort would have about the same value as the existing tag.sort, so if a patch is done well, it is likely that users would find it valuable, but let's leave the final judgement until we actually see the completed patch first. Thanks.