From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F2B207EC for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 17:20:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932213AbcJLRUY (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:20:24 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:54975 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932277AbcJLRUW (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:20:22 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473C045934; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:18:31 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=96hqJVjSIjhkvyURCOJVCT3bC4U=; b=usMqnp XVl7Y98hsJqWOb3yOLg9d4Nq0f5ueJBo6TKIKpQonodj1z2xVySCaoccV549BXut D9nfKsmaGWigF59cwP1FRdFtbR2QUwbp4KNnYfbSQC1et/q3mJfrFUq0heSDcoZf olEsqs70HkwckVCtqMWp2moMCRjn6M93LXyJo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=HOCdFc2ksbWOFVMCsINlAX/JMsL0GOg+ Gm6yo3OeQeFSpW3dAPAVqsHVV0+9MIkd1OLyLt6bqafmcl6JUZbh2alIQ001gJRM VcXeMQvD7Fi2QwYrtPqAg8Vt76WGyZFKWEUFmgUGyBdkNHsOUb6LEtIK6jtF2EFa KZZOcO2q5Ts= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2F045933; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:18:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A19D045932; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:18:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Heiko Voigt Cc: Stefan Beller , Jeff King , "git\@vger.kernel.org" , Jens Lehmann , Fredrik Gustafsson , Leandro Lucarella Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] serialize collection of changed submodules References: <10cd5be93601bc52388100e80b6c6735a7cacfb4.1475851621.git.hvoigt@hvoigt.net> <20161012130034.GA84247@book.hvoigt.net> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:18:28 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20161012130034.GA84247@book.hvoigt.net> (Heiko Voigt's message of "Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:00:34 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E595F5B2-909F-11E6-94B1-F99D12518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Heiko Voigt writes: > Which seems quite extensively long for a static function so how about > we shorten it a bit and add a comment: > > /* lookup or create commit object list for submodule */ > get_commit_objects_for_submodule_path(... Or you can even lose "get_" and "path", I guess. You are not even "getting" commits but the array that holds them, so the caller can use it to "get" one of them or it can even use it to "put" a new one, no? "get-commit-objects" is a misnomer in that sense. Either one of get_submodule_commits_array() submodule_commits() perhaps? I dunno.