From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] odb/source-files: only reload alternates when the file has changed
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 12:59:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq33u0uoqp.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261020-pks-odb-files-reload-alternates-v1-4-d9e156323836@pks.im> (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Tue, 20 Oct 2026 10:54:55 +0200")
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> + if (!validity || !stat_validity_check(validity, path)) {
> + int fd = open(path, O_RDONLY);
> + if (fd < 0) {
> + warn_on_fopen_errors(path);
> + if (validity)
> + stat_validity_clear(validity);
> + } else {
> + if (validity)
> + stat_validity_update(validity, fd);
> + if (strbuf_read(&buf, fd, 1024) < 0)
> + warning_errno(_("unable to read alternates file '%s'"),
> + path);
> + else
> + parse_alternates(buf.buf, '\n', object_dir, out);
> + close(fd);
When we update validity and then fail to strbuf_read(), say due to a
transient I/O error or something that was caused by somebody else
mucking with our alternates list at the same time, we warn, but do
not roll back the validity update even though we failed to parse. I
wonder if it is safer to run the validity update only after
successfully read the alternates file, and if the extra safety is
worth it?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-20 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-20 8:54 [PATCH 0/4] odb/files: reload alternates on retry again Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-20 8:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] odb/source-files: rename alternates-related functions Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-20 8:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] odb/source-files: reload alternates on retry Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-21 14:32 ` Christian Couder
2026-10-20 8:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] odb/source-files: avoid rechecking already-known alternates Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-20 8:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] odb/source-files: only reload alternates when the file has changed Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-20 19:59 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-10-21 10:17 ` Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq33u0uoqp.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox