From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Meet Soni <meetsoni3017@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, ps@pks.im, shejialuo@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [GSoC][PATCH v2 0/5] Add refs optimize subcommand
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2025 07:07:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq348xyr5b.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250906075147.1076656-1-meetsoni3017@gmail.com> (Meet Soni's message of "Sat, 6 Sep 2025 13:21:42 +0530")
Meet Soni <meetsoni3017@gmail.com> writes:
> This series introduces `git refs optimize` as a modern replacement for
> `git pack-refs`, continuing the effort to consolidate commands
> under the `git refs` namespace.
Sorry, but I do not quite see the point of this change. Is it your
goal to eventually remove "git pack-refs"?
I would very much understand if this were:
"git pack-refs" is a command that is very specific to the files
backend to optimize the way refs are stored in that backend. It
does not do anything to other backends.
Introduce "git refs optimize" as the end-user facing front-end
so that later different backends, including reftable backend,
can define their own way to optimize the way refs are stored in
them. As the first step, switch on what backend is in use in
the repository, and invoke "git pack-refs" if the repository
uses the files backend.
And when framed this way, I am not sure it is a good direction
forward to have pack-refs.[ch] top-level files. I have to wonder if
the approach should be more along this line?
- Define the "optimize" action in the refs API. What it really
means to "optimize" may differ from backend to backend. There
may be refs_optimize(struct ref_store *refs) API entry point.
- Add the new action to the vtable for refs backends. There may be
no action defined for reftable backend for now, or you may find
there already are reftable specific optimizations you want to
trigger from there.
- Figure out how this interacts with existing refs_pack_refs();
most likely it as the backend specific option, should go away,
and its implementation would move to the "optimize" action driven
from the vtable for files backend.
Once it is done, you do not necessarily need "git refs optimize",
but the "git pack-refs" could be the front-end to trigger the more
generic "optimize" action. In other words, in a repository whose
refs are stored in reftable, "git pack-refs" would cease to be a
no-op but can perform optimizations suitable in that repository.
That way, users do not need to learn a new command, which may be
also an advantage over what is being proposed here.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-08 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-06 7:51 [GSoC][PATCH v2 0/5] Add refs optimize subcommand Meet Soni
2025-09-06 7:51 ` [GSoC][PATCH v2 1/5] builtin/pack-refs: factor out core logic into a shared library Meet Soni
2025-09-06 7:51 ` [GSoC][PATCH v2 2/5] doc: factor out common option Meet Soni
2025-09-08 16:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-09-06 7:51 ` [GSoC][PATCH v2 3/5] builtin/refs: add optimize subcommand Meet Soni
2025-09-06 7:51 ` [GSoC][PATCH v2 4/5] t0601: refactor tests to be shareable Meet Soni
2025-09-06 7:51 ` [GSoC][PATCH v2 5/5] t: add test for git refs optimize subcommand Meet Soni
2025-09-08 14:07 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-09-08 16:41 ` [GSoC][PATCH v2 0/5] Add " Junio C Hamano
2025-09-18 5:46 ` [GSoC][PATCH v3 0/9] " Meet Soni
2025-09-18 5:46 ` [GSoC][PATCH v3 1/9] refs: add a generic 'optimize' API Meet Soni
2025-09-18 10:44 ` shejialuo
2025-09-18 15:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-09-18 5:46 ` [GSoC][PATCH v3 2/9] files-backend: implement 'optimize' action Meet Soni
2025-09-18 5:46 ` [GSoC][PATCH v3 3/9] reftable-backend: " Meet Soni
2025-09-18 5:46 ` [GSoC][PATCH v3 4/9] builtin/pack-refs: convert to use the generic refs_optimize() API Meet Soni
2025-09-18 10:43 ` shejialuo
2025-09-18 5:47 ` [GSoC][PATCH v3 5/9] builtin/pack-refs: factor out core logic into a shared library Meet Soni
2025-09-18 5:47 ` [GSoC][GSoC][PATCH v3 6/9] doc: pack-refs: factor out common options Meet Soni
2025-09-18 5:47 ` [GSoC][PATCH v3 7/9] builtin/refs: add optimize subcommand Meet Soni
2025-09-18 16:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-09-18 5:47 ` [GSoC][PATCH v3 8/9] t0601: refactor tests to be shareable Meet Soni
2025-09-18 5:47 ` [GSoC][PATCH v3 9/9] t: add test for git refs optimize subcommand Meet Soni
2025-09-19 8:26 ` [GSoC][PATCH v4 0/9] Add " Meet Soni
2025-09-19 8:26 ` [GSoC][PATCH v4 1/9] refs: add a generic 'optimize' API Meet Soni
2025-09-24 6:18 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-19 8:26 ` [GSoC][PATCH v4 2/9] files-backend: implement 'optimize' action Meet Soni
2025-09-19 8:26 ` [GSoC][PATCH v4 3/9] reftable-backend: " Meet Soni
2025-09-19 8:26 ` [GSoC][PATCH v4 4/9] builtin/pack-refs: convert to use the generic refs_optimize() API Meet Soni
2025-09-19 8:26 ` [GSoC][PATCH v4 5/9] builtin/pack-refs: factor out core logic into a shared library Meet Soni
2025-09-24 6:18 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-19 8:26 ` [GSoC][PATCH v4 6/9] doc: pack-refs: factor out common options Meet Soni
2025-09-19 8:26 ` [GSoC][PATCH v4 7/9] builtin/refs: add optimize subcommand Meet Soni
2025-09-19 8:26 ` [GSoC][PATCH v4 8/9] t0601: refactor tests to be shareable Meet Soni
2025-09-19 8:26 ` [GSoC][PATCH v4 9/9] t: add test for git refs optimize subcommand Meet Soni
2025-09-19 18:43 ` [GSoC][PATCH v4 0/9] Add " Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq348xyr5b.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=meetsoni3017@gmail.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
--cc=shejialuo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).