From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a3-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a3-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DCBE21FF5F for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2025 15:35:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.154 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752075324; cv=none; b=f+krgDjXjY6FoULqFuTTlUrrkwzpsCkvlMWRbe4IN3oZMXfnM5RgVqMhXkhXe5DVLgt8XUxU5KrZrlNxZ8CHMdis3TJPqP7Cw9oXnjfbeMHTrCV0occt2KHnWGG7MhGElWG9LM7GH04Li3i74vGE69KNzfvC28VWKXBnh6JrKQk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752075324; c=relaxed/simple; bh=baUoOHaaLTONuPNj5+YWGATTJn4+R59MAUf3iq8/zQw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZNjFfhkd1dOT3X2gAFZTFYnNttD5PYSKKxCsjPGVSMI39DXWc5ZMKvg/XG0dKUOC3DtAIgb52B6S/Y05w6IAwnlVMO8U9iXGimxwhZiszmAPtovpB1cydRuwcEpzDHajUEtjozLkW86dJgXerG76C3xba/FD0zltFz0EKbA1fj0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=HO6BMxAH; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=glama1iU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.154 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="HO6BMxAH"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="glama1iU" Received: from phl-compute-10.internal (phl-compute-10.phl.internal [10.202.2.50]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4546E140003E; Wed, 9 Jul 2025 11:35:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-02 ([10.202.2.161]) by phl-compute-10.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 09 Jul 2025 11:35:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1752075322; x=1752161722; bh=JVuE0FW54l RHtMdx2TtYt+dgAJpKigzDay3I4B7ZLZI=; b=HO6BMxAH/seQqX303fHvwuFnhF UqeldJ1Goi+nHskHjoYlVqJYken/+fGgvQQuAVg87GhPcOY1+jq/XkLRdYkJZnq2 iZhsYBmMH9UQU3uSZjBHdpbf06mUEiTIrrZP2hrK15h8OT3AhDlP01v+7vX+xJAB 9TOBG+zI/VT5CEVw8lTiDrLC1i7ULGBxWlsOihZXz98uoeE7Wmi79+XF+8fC07zf m+dFoBoOcPahxH5BJsaQKfIGz+gN6vQWSIHjcUEo1E9WjQ50JDrBpwiM4LLH/i9/ dYt1dCjH74sUsfb74YjWKh7nuqmclRamO9BG4WQllStBwxKb8xYfCZrw3gJg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1752075322; x=1752161722; bh=JVuE0FW54lRHtMdx2TtYt+dgAJpKigzDay3 I4B7ZLZI=; b=glama1iUy6EMmTJvZdD6n29ZO//blrRzM/c5s4+0syUr13R9Ye4 3pYLVyCphjolDau4nuWXOk1FLK7JieCGk+ykZeP+8SSLbOXhPKq4UPKYFCBk8D0y QsMULJJ3EcczL2o+Ai2HpJpvY1ldjTGRrf+l50K7LWJTFGtnoqiGYaUEamrd7vCn VUK5Xft08D7ckpfHGGU9cYSiehIYTMkvViI5l0m7IrW5+KVJCVE8h0bpLdQ6SiQc AgwXf3ZG7Rio5Dqy+HOihB+ovXC60YVFCoBFx98RtGYN/EdC+lHdf5FOfw/ixXXH RF5gNeB2g75cENNe2OWuLYMG4cUObmC/0cw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdefgdefjeelfecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjug hrpefhvfevufgjfhffkfgfgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefluhhnihhoucev ucfjrghmrghnohcuoehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeefveetteejheeugeffledvteeiveffueefjeelueffteeigffgfedthfefieeg ieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgih htshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeelpdhmohguvgepshhm thhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopegthhhrihhsthhirghnrdgtohhuuggvrhesghhmrghilh drtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehpshesphhkshdrihhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithesvhhg vghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehnvgifrhgvnhesghhmrghilhdrtg homhdprhgtphhtthhopehpvghffhesphgvfhhfrdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtohepshgrnhgu rghlshestghruhhsthihthhoohhthhhprghsthgvrdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtohepjhhohh grnhhnvghsrdhstghhihhnuggvlhhinhesghhmgidruggvpdhrtghpthhtoheptghhrhhi shgtohholhesthhugihfrghmihhlhidrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtshhtvghrse hpohgsohigrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 9 Jul 2025 11:35:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Christian Couder Cc: Patrick Steinhardt , git@vger.kernel.org, Elijah Newren , Jeff King , "brian m . carlson" , Johannes Schindelin , Christian Couder Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] fast-(import|export): improve on commit signature output format In-Reply-To: (Christian Couder's message of "Wed, 9 Jul 2025 02:19:06 +0200") References: <20250618151821.528627-1-christian.couder@gmail.com> <20250619133630.727274-1-christian.couder@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 08:35:20 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Christian Couder writes: >> And I totally agree with you that reviews often deserve very well >> reasoned responses, which take time to prepare; a response that >> comes as spinal reflex without much thought is often not very >> useful. >> >> It really depends on the definition of "fast" in "fast response". >> >> If we need a week to come up with a newer iteration, > > The issue is that whatever the time we could set as a norm, like "a > week" here or 2 or 3 days, or one month, or whatever, Yeah, topic sizes varies. Historically, summer is a slower season and these messages I sent are primarily for me to keep track of topics on flight. "I am on vacation for a few more weeks so expect response time longer than usual" would have been a perfectly fine response. Not even acknowledging receipt of review comments was what I primarily saw as a communication gap.