From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] clean up some MAYBE_UNUSED cases
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 13:46:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq34mnukff.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240829200807.GA430283@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 29 Aug 2024 16:08:07 -0400")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> - builtin/gc.c's check_crontab_process(). The whole function is marked
> as MAYBE_UNUSED here, which is a little funny. It's because
> is_crontab_available() may or may not call us based on __APPLE__.
> Should we conditionally define the function, too, in that case? It
> would mean repeating the #ifdef. Alternatively, we could define it
> like this:
>
> #ifdef __APPLE__
> static int check_crontab_process(const char *cmd UNUSED)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> #else
> static int check_crontab_process(const char *cmd UNUSED)
> {
> [...the real function...]
> }
> #endif
Or inline the body of check_crontab_process() at its sole callsite
(the other side of "#ifdef APPLE") in is_crontab_available() and get
rid of check_crontab_process().
> But I think we're getting into "well, this is how I would have
> written it" territory, and it doesn't matter much either way in
> practice. It's probably better to just leave it alone.
OK.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-29 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-29 20:08 [PATCH 0/2] clean up some MAYBE_UNUSED cases Jeff King
2024-08-29 20:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] gc: drop MAYBE_UNUSED annotation from used parameter Jeff King
2024-08-29 20:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] grep: prefer UNUSED to MAYBE_UNUSED for pcre allocators Jeff King
2024-08-29 20:27 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-08-30 6:39 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-08-30 16:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-08-29 20:46 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq34mnukff.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).