From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B246C4321E for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 03:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231186AbiLED0K (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2022 22:26:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34710 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230439AbiLED0I (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2022 22:26:08 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x42b.google.com (mail-pf1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 571AF11A3C for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2022 19:26:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id g1so2064434pfk.2 for ; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 19:26:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=asgBX/Y/jXj9I/9dJ2a2R1Gtk0ZD8To/wf9CEAF3Gjk=; b=FQaNQzikplTjpdj3N0ntjxsY0X3A+NjMfXI4C+7DhW+QM0hc5mIw1iwTlTrIre9kLE L8HiO1NnUJ/3FpdqWzrNrjD9dFWVXa/PKCn3wI9CbCRNFeDR0r0UHBjE7wX7dBsMJouQ 0CqT0SHZvTpM7ZIh//2GzmsH6vO/AvC6B7SL1WL3UOX7qMoES9bHfyAlJdOw+5wQ05fN 0GenaKq5DE51/D8bkaMB4+JsbHg2rAO8VOb9kXNFbPLDUHesCV1j2ZgF6G1o4oQQtPdB hNyQkIE7xgsgJ4/VFlHujIHAQZ7fbRls/RdH2KitHRpwfGHwNK5B0LFTOvhgyxdWhiSo FNRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:sender :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=asgBX/Y/jXj9I/9dJ2a2R1Gtk0ZD8To/wf9CEAF3Gjk=; b=7xcQZSOcfCech1vWIXJ5v+RDKDtlQrYaknrkSBu02qwh5kTiSjMaTQFMHkgUrW2GXx FbkoOs2qUibbdQDAyfeDTOnwYgwbMBYb2R2tuS/ShdgVFGq0ZA+h72QCAzDrF3uQpWWw WXb9OyOV85ded3H59pkhdYY8db5vmnpIGXo9rfneoUwCsBfBNT+ruQcLFYH/O3lyOF4z S2AEYWMo0s+aIr+9WlO9QkUc12FSPy1bw5xD6+uQj1DuCj2hSHh7bbDMdzUbpVSX2ZN5 M+VeO702JAIFH7lc7FpwO/T7sB6qmQSy1zJn0/pbywER55hPFEM97S4NvPJ8TB1lEmXZ ZZYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pndZCojxQNxowsstvdgwwb/YvZ9/OJMDfwkj0yVmxb3YqAgLXi/ E/j86Juvz74K7xecxHfBCfzOtDlncRyX8g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6rg3gml7LtVz+2IA8E1FTka/ZRzENuEtqOugeFPK7gQ9O77WlpsqSJjscD2xFkUkc5S8wuFA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:1054:0:b0:42b:9219:d14e with SMTP id 20-20020a631054000000b0042b9219d14emr54721608pgq.176.1670210762694; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 19:26:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (33.5.83.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.83.5.33]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id pw9-20020a17090b278900b00210c84b8ae5sm8127199pjb.35.2022.12.04.19.26.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 04 Dec 2022 19:26:02 -0800 (PST) Sender: Junio C Hamano From: Junio C Hamano To: Victoria Dye Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Rub=C3=A9n?= Justo , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2022, #01; Thu, 1) References: Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 12:26:01 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Victoria Dye's message of "Fri, 2 Dec 2022 12:11:16 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Victoria Dye writes: > Rubén Justo wrote: >> On 01-dic-2022 21:23:40, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> * rj/branch-copy-and-rename (2022-11-17) 2 commits >>> - branch: clear target branch configuration before copying or renaming >>> - branch: force-copy a branch to itself via @{-1} is a no-op >>> ... >> We can drop the first commit (branch: clear target branch configuration >> before copying or renaming) as it needs a better approach. But we can >> keep the other (branch: force-copy a branch to itself via @{-1} is a >> no-op), there were no complaints about it, I think. > > Agreed. I think "branch: clear target branch configuration before copying or > renaming" is probably worth revisiting at some point, but "branch: > force-copy a branch to itself via @{-1} is a no-op" looks fine to be as-is. OK, let's discard the tip one and mark the other one to be merged to 'next'. Thanks, both.