From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B005C4332F for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 16:05:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229543AbiJLQFn (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2022 12:05:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50532 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229451AbiJLQFm (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2022 12:05:42 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (pb-smtp20.pobox.com [173.228.157.52]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A16F3FD54 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 09:05:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0AFD1B5297; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 12:05:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=MwnmUs6/VH4s CerjcNY2vFlkmyoE5R0deUE5AVL5Npk=; b=XSf9IicUWQIPWSNUPE/3z6iDwZQH IWc3xVPkcBUw6ia1K+Dg2mpdTe4dEtfBOxjUUSPhUYFbVDL6gtX1bq1XvAc526SL xJKF54bE51Vc9zxh1j2RRWcwTG5uiHQP2RMC0PS0cS/nUCGnPxDvM74gWFLGbzRd 36EFzVZ6iGSHzS4= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41BE1B5296; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 12:05:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.83.5.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 210A51B5295; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 12:05:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Phillip Wood Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , git@vger.kernel.org, Calvin Wan , Emily Shaffer Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/22] run-command.c: use C99 "for (TYPE VAR = ..." syntax where useful References: Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 09:05:36 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Phillip Wood's message of "Wed, 12 Oct 2022 14:04:35 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B5CBF1A2-4A47-11ED-8574-C2DA088D43B2-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Phillip Wood writes: >> while (1) { >> - for (i =3D 0; >> + for (int i =3D 0; > > Here we are moving the declaration to the loop. > > Am I missing something, I don't understand how these changes match > this description in the commit message It matches the commit title, and makes it clear that this does not have to be part of this series. =C3=86var, try to do a focused series that achieves the objective of the topic well, without succumbing to the temptation of creature feep. It is especially important when you are taking other peoples' series hostage by requesting them to rebase on you. Thanks.