From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0DDC433FE for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 20:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238307AbiCAUe3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2022 15:34:29 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47240 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238142AbiCAUe0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2022 15:34:26 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 982A13A5D9 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 12:33:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C22818DF51; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 15:33:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=r+nhBHb4V24zW//DAXzBdbvo7o/bVrPEv86Dmy Gy7yE=; b=Lom5KBqQCgV18PAHP8zNAsTVfVbxzV5jp8AwTTEJFMOCAaSobGuWVR KQHEXKdo+HJfaUoxpQBz/24VwaIpuuDrEEX9OekjVWig7RpM/M0kh1jgubWz8e6U /uO+gTnsEvkQjOUmHTdCyBlS1cLouS/SipH9+zwJwXc9MQ3KLQhXI= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4481618DF50; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 15:33:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.82.80.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A18A18DF4F; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 15:33:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Glen Choo , git@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Tan , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] fetch: fetch unpopulated, changed submodules References: <20220215172318.73533-1-chooglen@google.com> <20220224100842.95827-1-chooglen@google.com> <20220224100842.95827-10-chooglen@google.com> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 12:33:39 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Tue, 1 Mar 2022 21:24:15 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E1487EE0-999E-11EC-A10F-CBA7845BAAA9-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > Hi, > > On Sat, 26 Feb 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> A few tests added by this patch have been failing on one specific >> job (linux-gcc ubuntu-latest) at GitHub CI. >> >> https://github.com/git/git/runs/5341052811?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:3968 >> https://github.com/git/git/runs/5343133021?check_suite_focus=true#step:4:5520 >> >> Side note: you may need to be logged in to GitHub to view them. >> These two use different versions of CI to show the test traces; >> in the latter you may have to click on right-facing rectangle on >> the line with label "5520" to see the breakage. >> >> I think there is some baked-in assumption in the failing test what >> the name of the initial branch by default is, which may be the reason >> why this particular job fails while others don't. >> >> Can you take a look at it? > > The log says this: > ... > At least that's how _I_ tried to address similar issues in the test suite > in the past. Yes, I had a squashable fix/workaround queued since last night.