From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76A8C433F5 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 20:37:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236640AbhLGUlS (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:41:18 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:53807 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232255AbhLGUlR (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:41:17 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF78E1DCA; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:37:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=VxdcpAuPm0m/k+Bojg0fHzpjgjKk4svBQzJS+H x6x2M=; b=Gcc4q/Zb7zofp046/sRcKiKvzkpTwpvZ5Fgo/vS90LLbgo0QuDohv6 H1BAolPH2NkC+0QL4wvaBK4SwYxIlB5Bsu/7Jnz0MRvwA6d2tdxcx45HciJvXJAF rhMFRnHkccPuM/t116MzoL8CghVQkBPr9xqa6hpFLu0FUyEuoFU3s= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3297E1DC9; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:37:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.133.2.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10544E1DC8; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:37:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Phillip Wood Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] revision: use C99 declaration of variable in for() loop References: <20211113122833.174330-1-gotlouemail@gmail.com> <20211113130508.zziheannky6dcilj@gmail.com> <2b2386b9-045d-a0b8-6dbc-8a9d0c446bea@gmail.com> <211114.868rxqu7hr.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> <61518213-9ce8-00d2-efd9-7f2091c574c4@gmail.com> <836296d0-6eee-7c6b-04d0-d93909948611@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 12:37:44 -0800 In-Reply-To: <836296d0-6eee-7c6b-04d0-d93909948611@gmail.com> (Phillip Wood's message of "Tue, 7 Dec 2021 11:10:14 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 88F42AC0-579D-11EC-912F-C48D900A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Phillip Wood writes: > ... I guess that means we > have not had any warning flags set (because no such flags exist?) to > protect against the accidental introduction of the construct that this > patch is testing compiler support for. I think we actually saw some instances of "for (type var = ..." slipped through the review process, only to later get caught by some other means.