From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4026C433E0 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 18:13:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7460164FA0 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 18:13:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230053AbhCKSMi (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:12:38 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:58808 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229483AbhCKSMK (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:12:10 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358EAB434B; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:12:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=7jjYDco3Gh7V5kCr3bpYgSgEMfo=; b=x4uWw0 odoaUyMjQQdiVnLBmR2cWkcPONpPl9gaEMR6CJ0MuaPSyXktsBj237R8nW0JTe8V nfayZOueVc2alCFG7cCLyCbRdJJsAjUqllE3bMuBk1ybw+Ug7RRqVwa2uMZwmcVO WPcSmAyYTxt3spCxXpu4iTC9FXCYIpA7MSHtM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=lcw02h9Gy9LQb1IuUA8ZMzua532DpTgO K5w9cNXtcBOp7W/LGPPPdlvHDftcyGWHn1V6YUZ6u/77Rd24qfBPuuNAi+WGfXvZ LjP33OPJtViFASKmE+x0hgvAMc8jqb3XmCt6Tzxf6DrNQjZK83EH1e2PtJDzh0zS 0THaAwEYpmk= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2F1B434A; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:12:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2ACD3B4349; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:12:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Han-Wen Nienhuys Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , git , Elijah Newren , Jeff King , Taylor Blau , =?utf-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9?= Scharfe Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2021, #03; Wed, 10) References: <87r1klhq3y.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 10:12:05 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Han-Wen Nienhuys's message of "Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:01:27 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4A39ACE8-8295-11EB-9956-74DE23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > However, the primary reason nothing has changed is that I posted a > large round of updates early December, in response to reviews from > Google's git team, and I haven't gotten any code review or other type > of feedback since (except your one message about the errno side band) > > Is there anything I should do to get this moving again? Unfortunately there aren't many effective things the patch authors can do (other than making sure their series are easily digestible and by begging X-<) when nobody is looking at their patches and potential reviewers and those who may show interest in the series are running around producing their own changes instead of giving reviews, both positive and negative. I try to chip in with my own reviewing time but I am only a single person, so help from others are required. Thanks.