From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA67C433DB for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 07:06:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A609922C7E for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 07:06:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726096AbhAXHEf (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jan 2021 02:04:35 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:60240 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725808AbhAXHEd (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jan 2021 02:04:33 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32D293B58; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 02:03:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=7HkWaam+8m708PRPS23RY4IwFEw=; b=dQ/6km kFE1IARFtoWUkBoRH+IdyMymu3LCVAIkeyvJtmFUcEP5CNpE5Em2VS4OlKDCoEQB /w02yLm1wczQME6jUuoOxM9ONqEURw6AdQ3cH5y5lxclQvZS54Kut3FPou4JxKh9 rZklLO9d025ZHT0/58TqNlrs6cCUxtzkRe+fo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=tPVLm7+306vutgiaIZ6VrJE1WPFumU9I goB2eDQXnXda2C1anUMWSm+19k239IIidP3v8gWSxCPre4BQ0Sp/1OjyqGs6ec8o 6HM7Qq7o38ZSMEoZRD7JhXAj/ejgvKG6Jbq8jOFz1vTPNdJpUznS3dqyj5SUh3qW YYkYjS/HqEY= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CED193B56; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 02:03:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.196.36.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E65A93B54; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 02:03:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Elijah Newren Cc: Git Mailing List , Taylor Blau , Derrick Stolee Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2021, #04; Sat, 16) References: Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 23:03:49 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Elijah Newren's message of "Sat, 23 Jan 2021 21:27:50 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4F7A7680-5E12-11EB-8A27-D152C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Elijah Newren writes: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:35 AM Junio C Hamano wrote: >> ... >> Even though I wanted to merge the en/ort-directory-rename down to >> 'next' yesterday, it has just got updated and I had to rebase the >> ort-perf branch using the material from the old thread, so neither >> is in 'next' as of now. > ... > reports, it's kinda important to get it right. So... > > * I'm not touching en/ort-directory-rename; I still think it is ready > for merging to next. By "not touching", do you mean you now want me to discard the latest round that is on en/ort-directory-rename and revert the topic to the previous version?