Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Git v3.0 timeline, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2026, #08)
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 06:49:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq4ifhgzvx.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76ac51df-cef8-c6a9-2610-8c21f03c6999@gmx.de> (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Tue, 22 Sep 2026 15:25:57 +0200 (CEST)")

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:

> Hi Junio,
>
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2026, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Git 2.56-rc1 has been tagged.  We may merge last-minute fixes before
>> the final Git 2.56 release, but otherwise I do not expect any new
>> feature topics to be ready before the final, so most of the
>> in-flight topics will stay cooking in 'next' until then.  As
>> discussed at the Git Contributors' Summit, the version after the
>> upcoming Git 2.56 will be Git 2.98, scheduled near the end of this
>> year.
>
> Would you say that the following is an accurate characterization of the
> timeline, so that people who need to plan dependent projects can rely on
> it?

My outline was deliberately limited up to end of this year as I am
hesitant to say beyond that point before the meeting notes are made
public.  I am not sure who will be releasing it to the public and
when, though with the open nature of this community I believe it
will happen soon.  I do not recall anything controversial in the 3.0
section of the meeting notes.

> Rust was treated as mandatory for v3.0, and the explicit check for
> objections drew none from anyone in the room. Compared with the
> contentious portability discussion on the Git mailing list, that is a
> notable signal. It does not establish that the portability problems
> themselves are solved.

It signals that the room was smaller than the list.  Or enough time
passed since we discussed some minority platforms having trouble
with Rust the last time to change the situation.  Or little bit of
both ;-)

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-22 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-22  0:11 What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2026, #08) Junio C Hamano
2026-09-22  8:11 ` kh/format-patch-range-diff-notes Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-09-22 13:25 ` Git v3.0 timeline, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2026, #08) Johannes Schindelin
2026-09-22 13:49   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-09-22 17:06     ` Johannes Schindelin
2026-09-24  3:56       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-24  4:30         ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-24 12:29           ` Johannes Schindelin
2026-09-24 17:00             ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-24 18:08           ` Ramsay Jones
2026-09-22 18:44     ` My summary of the Git Contributors' Summit 2026, was " Johannes Schindelin
2026-09-23 11:55       ` Daniele Sassoli
2026-09-24 12:31         ` Johannes Schindelin
2026-09-25  9:53         ` Luca Milanesio
2026-09-23 12:52       ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-23 14:22       ` Security mailing list & process, was Re: My summary of the Git Contributors' Summit 2026 Toon Claes
2026-09-24 12:38         ` Johannes Schindelin
2026-09-23 14:40       ` Git Contributor' summit: Documentation, was: Re: My summary of the Git Contributors' Summit 2026, was Re: Git v3.0 timeline, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2026, #08) Toon Claes
2026-09-23 15:15         ` Git Contributor' summit: Documentation, Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq4ifhgzvx.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox