From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73E36368293 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 14:48:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.153 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775746118; cv=none; b=g1hjFzhFaDCXFzN1olw9k+f50/3Zmm1erCbEQkUzQib2XBX05liSVfjPRmdEeEorsrg4InOj9ulovzaJZ+xzjLlR3fudVGI2HCT0QIfzneYj06uUCopNMWK5Ap1mu0OpbYR5jQ+OA6fBVvqM2UQqtb//ADd4J0KyDBQrsvSVVTM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775746118; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qgPVS756c+oJaSDs7F4cSgygpN1q8pGrRMH3RGHtRkc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=sKMLb6qYTf0rFAwkb/iXHNr/uIQLuu1Emkj60MXrqPaGj7Vs6iv3tC/YlSPiau8giCNy5/jef1ilGerM2OkS/4AM3NezpXFKjSQyAcQJzTNwYvAPB2pYxKOnqS8gnAxbMrHfFUGJhqIfNy8TwY7K7ItZom9NXcl6msfwq97SBII= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=YAy7qPOO; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=ZP1/E8pB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.153 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="YAy7qPOO"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="ZP1/E8pB" Received: from phl-compute-02.internal (phl-compute-02.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C336114001F8; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 10:48:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-02.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 09 Apr 2026 10:48:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1775746106; x=1775832506; bh=UvbX3fLQuy f11T3fdSUDbQ7KlhWW4e7AtL9ndkERNX0=; b=YAy7qPOOajWgNox4fe8g8aiF6w OeXjfxiezT+DpR6BkhxMmlZuQ4hJ68ZXOQj8EBQeGvOR88dvIk8HT061oRApmOLb R/Pv45y+KZNeiQMxrWuNnw8er59wgS5bNsqA4QUfx1gCVeaGtYv/vWBT4VZ5l4ez dIxesT0qGPLf6Fe36pd8z3AW/8hbiopTNaFctdafOyeuoCY36+o1gKyP3P4nSAEL D3nl41eoPcrry06E67JokRCkzEQNFDc9eNxmJrIkiewiNZkpdPheOxCCc5MpzzKu f5mnl3MZysAU0HgL2lB8JKYVo6V9HUHN45DLDidWJUTh0L5JTOBkBT9RY/xw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1775746106; x=1775832506; bh=UvbX3fLQuyf11T3fdSUDbQ7KlhWW4e7AtL9 ndkERNX0=; b=ZP1/E8pB206JuKddXKch4uOl/U/k2ddFvBDOGedL/+Ad4Bp+82k L+LKsqnHz1W5xhsj2gmOgn9tGyEJsejAtk2oIvCvMjGaOtRWepVDAk5RVArsXkoa Dwu2RY3DbL8EYcg3VktpW32TszCA/lNHrYvCu/nybABkyhDhE9DFNSH2bdDkU0fL z4ZJrwqu2LT7mjXkqBTexvtO9vJfWQGWdaEJL7TFGHcKGjTqw5soLAtKGQW4ssUH TPO4L/omG5PQiJkLF/Bk3iWsbT5nBiyK9C08IAicqxhPRosZjpdykOBBOeTE25Wj w5b4XInoI5n0Ro67oYUlNEhDp7dEVlhT1tQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefhedrtddtgddvieejiecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjug hrpefhvfevufgjfhffkfgfgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefluhhnihhoucev ucfjrghmrghnohcuoehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeefveetteejheeugeffledvteeiveffueefjeelueffteeigffgfedthfefieeg ieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgih htshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeeipdhmohguvgepshhm thhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehkrghrthhhihhkrddukeeksehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpd hrtghpthhtohepghhithhgihhtghgrughgvghtsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthht ohepghhithesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehsthholhgvvg esghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehjrgihvghshhgurghgrgelleesghhmrghi lhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 10:48:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Karthik Nayak Cc: Jayesh Daga via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Derrick Stolee , Jayesh Daga Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] repo: add paths.toplevel to repo info In-Reply-To: (Karthik Nayak's message of "Thu, 9 Apr 2026 09:13:35 -0400") References: Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2026 07:48:25 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Karthik Nayak writes: > Don't we still have to decide how we want to support relative vs > absolute paths? [1] I suspect more than just a few requests to this command yield path-valued response, so do we want an independent boolean "if we are showing a path, show it in relative (yes) or absolute (no)" option, or something? > Also seeing that you're a GSoC candidate and this is part of the project > that you've (and other potential contributors) applied for, our > recommendation is to not start working on a project before the selection > process. Perhaps I should refrain from commenting on these patches to discourage the authors if that is the case. I am not raising an objection, but do you have a pointer to the rationale behind the recommendation?