public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Beat Bolli <dev+git@drbeat.li>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,  Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] imap-send: remove two string length checks
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 11:55:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq4immp56h.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260311121107.1122387-4-dev+git@drbeat.li> (Beat Bolli's message of "Wed, 11 Mar 2026 13:11:06 +0100")

Beat Bolli <dev+git@drbeat.li> writes:

> At this point, these two checks verify that the ASN1_STRINGs are
> internally consistent. This may have been ok when the fields were
> accessed directly, but now that the API is used, is unnecessary.
>
> Remove the two checks.

Oswald already gave a similar comment, but

 * I am not sure what you meant by "ok" in "may have been ok".  Do
   you mean "with raw access to the fields, it may have been made
   send to ensure validity of ASN1_STRING"?

 * I am also not sure what you meant by "now that the API is used".
   Who in the code uses which API function so that we do not have to
   do our sanity checking?

   The call to host_matches() that these extra checks protect are
   still passing raw "const char *" in this step, and the change to
   pass ASN1_STRING does not happen until [4/4], so you did not mean
   host_matches().  I am not sure what it is.
   
Thanks.

>
> Signed-off-by: Beat Bolli <dev+git@drbeat.li>
> ---
>  imap-send.c | 5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/imap-send.c b/imap-send.c
> index 2a904314dd..2bb0003f08 100644
> --- a/imap-send.c
> +++ b/imap-send.c
> @@ -253,8 +253,6 @@ static int verify_hostname(X509 *cert, const char *hostname)
>  			ASN1_STRING *subj_alt_str = GENERAL_NAME_get0_value(subj_alt_name, &ntype);
>  
>  			if (ntype == GEN_DNS &&
> -			    strlen((const char *)ASN1_STRING_get0_data(subj_alt_str)) ==
> -				    ASN1_STRING_length(subj_alt_str) &&
>  			    host_matches(hostname, (const char *)ASN1_STRING_get0_data(subj_alt_str)))
>  				found = 1;
>  		}
> @@ -270,8 +268,7 @@ static int verify_hostname(X509 *cert, const char *hostname)
>  	    (cname_entry = X509_NAME_get_entry(subj, i)) == NULL ||
>  	    (cname = X509_NAME_ENTRY_get_data(cname_entry)) == NULL)
>  		return error("cannot get certificate common name");
> -	if (strlen((const char *)ASN1_STRING_get0_data(cname)) == ASN1_STRING_length(cname) &&
> -	    host_matches(hostname, (const char *)ASN1_STRING_get0_data(cname)))
> +	if (host_matches(hostname, (const char *)ASN1_STRING_get0_data(cname)))
>  		return 0;
>  	return error("certificate owner '%s' does not match hostname '%s'",
>  		     ASN1_STRING_get0_data(cname), hostname);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-11 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-11 12:11 [PATCH 0/4] imap-send: modernize the OpenSSL API Beat Bolli
2026-03-11 12:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] imap-send: use the OpenSSL API to access the subject alternative names Beat Bolli
2026-03-11 12:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] imap-send: use the OpenSSL API to access the subject common name Beat Bolli
2026-03-11 12:11 ` [PATCH 3/4] imap-send: remove two string length checks Beat Bolli
2026-03-11 13:41   ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2026-03-11 21:49     ` Beat Bolli
2026-03-11 18:55   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-03-11 22:00     ` Beat Bolli
2026-03-11 12:11 ` [PATCH 4/4] imap-send: refactor function host_matches() Beat Bolli
2026-03-11 22:10 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] imap-send: modernize the OpenSSL API Beat Bolli
2026-03-12  0:25   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-11 22:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] imap-send: use the OpenSSL API to access the subject alternative names Beat Bolli
2026-03-11 22:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] imap-send: use the OpenSSL API to access the subject common name Beat Bolli
2026-03-11 22:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] imap-send: move common code into function host_matches() Beat Bolli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq4immp56h.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=dev+git@drbeat.li \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox