From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18E51277026 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2026 18:29:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.148 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772044156; cv=none; b=mWc73Uo6ebo83xY/AGd81uS7T2BoR6aehF540KvKb54v19kemYFCI9I2YjfjZkhd0FfS2mODmYMbqbstvdZrSpYeUOQHSWwuqf+lKHgGqgV9uKvAgvwzuZ3PfUy+bH05r9Mz/twvyYG4NJ+Lg4ByUm+X2hO/04Zo8XFYAlsxg3I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772044156; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YRFMx/SCVUUAG0T234XFm8TrMT2Zy6xwlMKNUXJuNGg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=U02ou2JZNaZQYl7uuvnQTiYM8pAMa/VLz9Zs/aUFrP/7l6uHjAaWGiRVE5XAyW9my/vXM7aFI/0Lg59VPWqmMP0VjhAnarnjQeXY+Oy1S7iQC5HM33gf3k36Ed9O7j7VSzV1icStr7CiXwQrOAyajVPmbFwxbI2k5UprM3ryTio= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=S1KW93o8; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=IhGQC+Pd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.148 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="S1KW93o8"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="IhGQC+Pd" Received: from phl-compute-08.internal (phl-compute-08.internal [10.202.2.48]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADDEEC060C; Wed, 25 Feb 2026 13:29:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-08.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 25 Feb 2026 13:29:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1772044154; x=1772130554; bh=qnoA05OAy7 w87KRIbk2y+pX46IqfjRhmvVgKxhtUx1I=; b=S1KW93o8/YCB8p6bo+J3W0kpG1 lx3VM/bW7sKf9x3tUQPUZw3IbpbDlneAlbe4X1i4AvknM/iLbVqJq3dy6zHA6ewv JfU7+6LkwLvXw/4+qOtk9UBy/3BpkUqvpibwUvJF70zbkRj5V3kaQwY7dJiQDClY lYNpO71m0ZDyDgmHnpoUSi/xgSo/lWksoOMxQyxx028amlN8V/1mBrl2YSzBxMsO 2SmKQ8o9vMIJx0M9jB3NW/u0A6MbHDsfrUvcGWiGvmcNj9IiGfnnlVOuOS2/qACD LCXKlt1iJB4RQ4a4W1KCtyARcoooQ9m0KwpFTR16BENm2skrnZ6ZhZp0VD1g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1772044154; x=1772130554; bh=qnoA05OAy7w87KRIbk2y+pX46IqfjRhmvVg KxhtUx1I=; b=IhGQC+Pdo7jRBLqHqiOLnWa+S4c+9EmRrsaKPd1s77eDc39+bB1 7k5RL+zBVlyLLZtNZ+AEf/6EPIZVRo3l0gsLKQnszA1WXoLQ+d4ykd1pw1zRZXgi WXfMYynaVJbpi3k8EDqb/2N2rlI3pZusSMH2xbm/YUNMXxtqQosAm151kW+KYaLf XdoduHoafIssFVNWg9w0KbaF8Ke474sWnY6keDj9gS+S8ZqcLwYW7ZGUTQToQTIW OsgA4S1tPSeOO33tJJFM00mkgFguYCyDKh8kGeobEv25rVP9L35anJ9tIWolPzzK 0NzAXMloM9GmtUmu6Ndu+4F42MtuFIl3EHw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefgedrtddtgddvgeefkeefucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvfevufgjfhffkfgfgggtsehttdertd dtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefluhhnihhoucevucfjrghmrghnohcuoehgihhtshhtvghrsehp ohgsohigrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeefveetteejheeugeffledvteeive ffueefjeelueffteeigffgfedthfefieegieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecu rfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmpdhnsg gprhgtphhtthhopeefpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopegrlhigsehk vghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorh hgpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 25 Feb 2026 13:29:13 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Alejandro Colomar Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: --no-decorate and %d in git-log(1) In-Reply-To: (Alejandro Colomar's message of "Wed, 25 Feb 2026 18:55:26 +0100") References: Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 10:29:12 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Alejandro Colomar writes: > Would you mind changing %d to be affected by --decorate=? I would imagine everybody would strongly mind as the scripts they have already written and have been using for years will be broken by such a change. So changing how %d works is a non-starter. But that does not mean we cannot add a different placeholder that behaves that way. I wonder if it is the cleanest to extend the %(decoreate: