From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-b5-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-b5-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C5382F3E for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2025 04:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.148 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752121481; cv=none; b=HJEmvhesftB66A2zNbvAIwYL0EQWxF/gsWZVutTazBWlWlH6IuOb7x5hzfjGELoSdEFy9uKBRvmClcjCrOqqmlHjfomqRvB0wFY33ZSGK8Ban/2bgLkIbEJMekL3/qrK52BsTWVAjnKL/wydwx5l9fMYTtKmVhUGf9cuupn9qMU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752121481; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VNMcKqjZuGiQFsy9H+fmytwcRrBlax68r+fln6vW65E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YrLqxkU2ZGp3DfM48TiG4uUYeEn3lAydhyeJvVf2b7zoIK+G1w9dlWd8zCWYZNxi0vhLrz6IBnp+kdthVYmBOqDx+tIZcH8fn4RWVzDMhcdp5sf9ynwFEEOUX9vT3Ba1HR5PxbfWyL9sTOn9VUiQxi3vWeuK0sMI+qBk/M7Ic/0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=fWPbDNep; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=Tq/3kJ7Q; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.148 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="fWPbDNep"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="Tq/3kJ7Q" Received: from phl-compute-11.internal (phl-compute-11.phl.internal [10.202.2.51]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D211D000F6; Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:24:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-11.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:24:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1752121478; x=1752207878; bh=oLW/XZN8vaR/q+f69dJ8JFSXkqgb+GpQHYLUK2hd69g=; b= fWPbDNepqLv4Auaxa8sHdEz+5xU8bmLy7d2q9exxqPogRrBmRzXyhNTO9TxEDu4l MEF0fF8cyjuu7yL5+6xTR+F8bzpC2/Aej/lB3B+ZEeUCkIuGn31D1HYQYdVyLOmQ oQwktqnO46c2jq9Qt3aPS0BuQ3IkPfL3jPHI+9WBzE7IlDjZWUBZ3obbeOtFVbpE Zr/ZnASDE+dwB6Tyyba/1EyiBSAnZhCzyaPqK4tSbNQ6NFNRFMgNXQ+WlQXrvad7 Horcy3605CR/JVVeQYqyKTMeg1vhpsCQEGKCwzDywEYHn6MCkS6Uce2+WjPP6wob N2MVXGUUH03qz5FHuiDPVQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1752121478; x= 1752207878; bh=oLW/XZN8vaR/q+f69dJ8JFSXkqgb+GpQHYLUK2hd69g=; b=T q/3kJ7QrG1HjPqrYCa9cdPvL6NrZKYKPVFwSOSINtcmqTje32MJRE8thXdy/hB+Y um1MxB++QHCBYIa00c/cAjJ2S9HDrNPvY7ZVhJAUXaVmSzZ/0NV1Hva72lI7+8MM UMWJWw64hy0odmNwB0gzqjscxVA4ZfnR7ygkkm7W1aLwcH80hhr5Atlnfvxsuhw8 ug4HRjfmLOdsaZXI3PvDU/OwptEWcL4R884xHP8QohX79QfLol3kxnz1Q2j41gm0 Q0LPnm4LI9JFuC0nNpYvsZK1uzr7+LcFBEeeS7j1KbiVyVSKPOYfw7wF/5zBdvn8 1xQoCQEBU3plTr6uCLxpg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdefgdefleegjecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjug hrpefhvfevufgjfhffkfgfgggtgfesthekredttderjeenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcu vecujfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnheptdffvdetgedvtdekteefveeuveelgfekfeehiefgheevhedvkeehleevveef tdehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepgh hithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohephedpmhhouggvpehs mhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepnhgvfihrvghnsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpth htohepmhgvsehtthgrhihlohhrrhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehpvghffhesphgvfhhf rdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtph htthhopehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:24:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Elijah Newren Cc: Taylor Blau , Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2025, #02; Mon, 7) In-Reply-To: (Elijah Newren's message of "Wed, 9 Jul 2025 18:05:16 -0700") References: Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 21:24:36 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Elijah Newren writes: > On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 5:01 PM Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> Taylor Blau writes: >> >> >> * tb/midx-avoid-cruft-packs (2025-06-23) 9 commits >> >> - repack: exclude cruft pack(s) from the MIDX where possible >> >> - pack-objects: introduce '--stdin-packs=follow' >> >> - pack-objects: swap 'show_{object,commit}_pack_hint' >> >> - pack-objects: fix typo in 'show_object_pack_hint()' >> >> - pack-objects: perform name-hash traversal for unpacked objects >> >> - pack-objects: declare 'rev_info' for '--stdin-packs' earlier >> >> - pack-objects: factor out handling '--stdin-packs' >> >> - pack-objects: limit scope in 'add_object_entry_from_pack()' >> >> - pack-objects: use standard option incompatibility functions >> >> >> >> "pack-objects" has been taught to avoid pointing into objects in >> >> cruft packs from midx. >> >> >> >> Will merge to 'next'? >> >> source: >> > >> > I think that this one is ready to go. Since Elijah and Peff last >> > reviewed it, it hasn't changed substantially (other than a few >> > bugfix-related changes that were discovered while rolling this out at >> > GitHub). >> > >> > The series has been running on GitHub's production infrastructure for >> > the last month or two without issue, so I think this is good from a >> > stability perspective. >> > >> > I've CC'd Elijah and Peff here, since they were the last two to review >> > the series, but I don't think that they have any objections to this >> > moving along. >> >> OK. As they both seem to be active, let me wait for a bit and then >> mark it for 'next' unless we hear anything unexpected. >> >> Thanks. > > Yep, I think this version is good to merge to next; thanks. Thanks.