Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jan Berges <jan.berges@uni-bremen.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git clean -Xdf affects parent and sibling directories
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 13:24:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq4j15fnx1.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7d2cf91f-c4ac-41de-966d-3681ac549ef0@uni-bremen.de> (Jan Berges's message of "Fri, 7 Feb 2025 21:14:35 +0100")

Jan Berges <jan.berges@uni-bremen.de> writes:

> Run git clean -Xdf in a subdirectory of a directory ignored by Git.
>
> What did you expect to happen? (Expected behavior)
> All contents of this subdirectory are removed. From the man page:
> "Cleans the working tree [...], starting from the current directory"
>
> What happened instead? (Actual behavior)
> Ignored contents of parent and sibling directories are also removed.

Interesting observation.

Behind Git as a whole, there is a philosophy to track the entire
working tree as a single unit, so touching a file at the top-level
or in one subdirectory, going into a different subdirectory and
running "git status" and "git diff" would show changes, in line with
the spirit of tracking the whole tree as a single unit, made to that
file outside your current directory.  Of course, if you add changes
to a file at the top-level or a subdirectory, chdir to a different
subdirectory, touch some other files there, and say "git commit -a",
these changes outside your current directory would also be recorded.

The behaviour comes from the same principle.

I think "git grep" is a notable oddball.  Its UI is build around the
guess that end users would expect a similarity with vanilla "grep"
run with the "-r" option, so it only looks at the current directory
or below.

In hindsight, some may argue that "git clean" should also be an
exception, but I doubt that would have been a good UI even back
then, forcing end-users to remember which ones are always full-tree
operation and which ones are current-directory-and-below.

To limit the extent of potential damage, I'd always do a dry run
with "git clean -n" first, giving other arguments I intend to give
for the real run, and then swap "-n" with "-f".  The command should
take the usual pathspec, so "git clean ." should work as expected.

HTH.



  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-07 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-07 20:14 git clean -Xdf affects parent and sibling directories Jan Berges
2025-02-07 21:24 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-02-08  9:43   ` Jan Berges

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq4j15fnx1.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jan.berges@uni-bremen.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox