From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (pb-smtp1.pobox.com [64.147.108.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C5B118786F for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2024 16:31:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.70 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724862704; cv=none; b=sLCkPqDq57f63pkQYrWLK01tVKKPpiDaXbdLNyfi3xd+Lxti8uGZifSHhQEgQBkJ+pQUUxh5EjB5q9F4JdjNdrDOiOopfpONSkivkQuHwnOa+0tP2HIdwaI9JpG+Tu4CVLItfSOQ7nt6gFjTQ7BYrhQ+zgpuiYkrbmj0Z1F5v10= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724862704; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CwUGa1YPFcSw373R4bHV/pEyCgaMlYv5PTbOw+kCUog=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Y90H2FEa/y6WFJ1ya1L2XevDLssbVw0quwxNSsa/C0J/V3QyG38YxRZhS1zT319FxnTsK/T94jm2QAYrSbI2Fhr5SvigU2J9SA5d0yMzyr0gUSLeKBcxv00G1pyklJs1Z0LEfY06dcrCBRnUewe7jaGvwqKzfz8taOU8NtJTiik= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=MxqVc7y/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.70 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="MxqVc7y/" Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06451846B; Wed, 28 Aug 2024 12:31:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gitster@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=CwUGa1YPFcSw373R4bHV/pEyCgaMlYv5PTbOw+ kCUog=; b=MxqVc7y/QmPrBrOUd3pNhtmwUVLD3lv3acZ+IZHycUTeeijphKHRM6 8EFco1iqrzL5kjNshQBasDVECiRPUdNFd4xG5S4KyQ7wttg/vtgvXsAYUSqzJXQc vJ5tdaN6/hUq19TVMzPsEJp+NR/6EU19mK0cJZDniSzb9Gs7LIZ6k= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80E51846A; Wed, 28 Aug 2024 12:31:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gitster@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.94.240]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3EC7218469; Wed, 28 Aug 2024 12:31:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gitster@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Patrick Steinhardt Cc: Shubham Kanodia , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Improvement: `git-maintenance` to allow configuring of remotes to fetch In-Reply-To: (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Wed, 28 Aug 2024 13:32:34 +0200") References: Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:31:39 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 01762B38-655B-11EF-B2AF-2BAEEB2EC81B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Patrick Steinhardt writes: > I'm not aware of any discussion around this... I do not think so, either. I agree that it makes as much sense to limit prefetches to a subset of remotes as it makes sense to limit to certain hierarchies (e.g. excluding refs/changes/ or even limiting to refs/heads/seen and nothing else).