From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Cc: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>, James Liu <james@jamesliu.io>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re* [PATCH v4 0/3] advice: add "all" option to disable all hints
Date: Fri, 03 May 2024 13:08:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq4jbe64l9.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqbk5m65i8.fsf@gitster.g> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Fri, 03 May 2024 12:48:47 -0700")
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
>
>> different. Aren't both commands addressing the same use-case of
>> comparing one version of a series against a subsequent version? In
>> your response[3], you seemed to agree with that observation and
>> suggested instead simply increasing the default creation factor for
>> both commands (which sounds reasonable to me).
>
> I think Dscho's use case was compare only single updated series of
> his with seen that has tons of irrelevant other patches, to have the
> command sift the patches belong to other topics away while making
> comparison with the older incarnation of his topic. I never use the
> command for such a comparison, but I can imagine that in such a
> context lower criteria may help reduce false matches of his new
> commits with unrelated commits on 'seen'.
It seems that Dscho was in agreement that format-patch's use case
should try to be more aggressive at least back then. In the message
in the thread you pointed
https://lore.kernel.org/git/nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1903211209280.41@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet/
he does not give us the exact reason why he does not think the "more
aggressive" mode is not suitable for other use cases, though.
A similar thread was raised more recently:
https://lore.kernel.org/git/rq6919s9-qspp-rn6o-n704-r0400q10747r@tzk.qr/
Also, there was an attempt to clarify what the "factor" really
meant, but we did not get a real conclusion other than the UNIT to
measure the "factor" is called "percent" (without specifying what
100% is relative to, "percent" does not mean much to guide users
to guess what the right value would be).
https://lore.kernel.org/git/85snn12q-po05-osqs-n1o0-n6040392q01q@tzk.qr/
So, yes, --creation-factor=<value> is messy, I think a very high
value, much higher than the hardcoded default of 60, is more
appropriate for use in format-patch, but we do not know what bad
effect it would have if we used much higher default everywhere.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-03 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-24 3:58 [PATCH 0/2] advice: add "all" option to disable all hints James Liu
2024-04-24 3:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] advice: allow advice type to be provided in tests James Liu
2024-04-24 5:28 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-04-24 3:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] advice: add "all" option to disable all hints James Liu
2024-04-24 5:29 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-04-24 6:28 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Junio C Hamano
2024-04-24 6:48 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-04-24 13:52 ` Phillip Wood
2024-04-24 14:07 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-04-24 14:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-25 6:46 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-04-25 16:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-24 16:14 ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-24 16:21 ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-24 14:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-25 6:42 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-04-24 7:37 ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-29 1:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] advice: add --no-advice global option James Liu
2024-04-29 1:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " James Liu
2024-04-29 4:15 ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-29 5:01 ` James Liu
2024-04-29 5:36 ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-29 5:59 ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-29 6:04 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-04-29 6:12 ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-29 6:40 ` Jeff King
2024-04-29 6:55 ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-29 13:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-30 0:56 ` James Liu
2024-04-29 13:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-29 17:05 ` Rubén Justo
2024-04-29 17:54 ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-30 1:47 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] " James Liu
2024-04-30 1:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " James Liu
2024-04-30 5:18 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-04-30 6:24 ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-30 16:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-03 7:17 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] advice: add "all" option to disable all hints James Liu
2024-05-03 7:17 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] doc: clean up usage documentation for --no-* opts James Liu
2024-05-03 17:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-06 1:39 ` James Liu
2024-05-03 7:17 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] doc: add spacing around paginate options James Liu
2024-05-03 14:32 ` Karthik Nayak
2024-05-03 17:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-03 7:17 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] advice: add --no-advice global option James Liu
2024-05-08 0:40 ` [PATCH v4 4/3] t0018: two small fixes Junio C Hamano
2024-05-03 7:31 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] advice: add "all" option to disable all hints Dragan Simic
2024-05-03 18:00 ` Re* " Junio C Hamano
2024-05-03 19:26 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-05-03 19:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-03 20:08 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-05-03 21:24 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-05-05 11:03 ` Johannes Schindelin
2024-05-06 16:40 ` Re* " Junio C Hamano
2024-05-07 0:11 ` Dragan Simic
2024-05-07 0:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-07 4:45 ` Dragan Simic
2024-05-07 0:01 ` Dragan Simic
2024-05-03 14:35 ` Karthik Nayak
2024-05-05 23:17 ` James Liu
2024-05-03 17:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-05 23:20 ` James Liu
2024-05-06 1:10 ` James Liu
2024-05-06 16:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-06 23:08 ` James Liu
2024-05-07 6:23 ` Karthik Nayak
2024-05-06 16:41 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq4jbe64l9.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=dsimic@manjaro.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=james@jamesliu.io \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).