From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: John Passaro <john.a.passaro@gmail.com>
Cc: John Passaro via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] builtin/tag.c: add --trailer arg
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:23:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq4jbixzg6.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJdN7Kggv-y8xRhdFanTyxa5wP-bG0omBPuETW6qijA67gn8oQ@mail.gmail.com> (John Passaro's message of "Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:48:14 -0400")
John Passaro <john.a.passaro@gmail.com> writes:
> There's also project-specific trailers. For example, on my team,
> we use "Deploy-Strategy: ..." to tell CICD what deployment routines to run. This
> is pretty specific to us but worth calling out. Maybe could translate to a
> documentation example with something like "<Project-specific-trailer>: foo"
The last one that uses placeholders for both trailer tag and value
may be generic enough.
> However, in service of helping users find workarounds, shouldn't we tell them
> --trailer may be the culprit?
>
>> Failed to read '%s'. Try again without --trailer (use -e or -F to add trailers manually).
I dunno.
If -m/-F that wrote the original using the open/write_or_die/close
sequence succeeded, the "amend_file" thing successfully spawned
"interpret-trailers --in-place" and got control back, yet we fail
to read that message back, it does not smell like a failure with
that "--trailer" option to me. A failure with "--trailer" that
could be worked around would have been caught in "amend_file" thing,
before the control reaches this point, no?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-30 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-29 4:31 [PATCH] builtin/tag.c: add --trailer arg John Passaro via GitGitGadget
2024-04-29 6:50 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-04-29 14:50 ` John Passaro
2024-04-29 15:05 ` John Passaro
2024-04-29 17:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-29 15:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-29 16:38 ` John Passaro
2024-04-29 17:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-29 16:53 ` [PATCH v2] " John Passaro via GitGitGadget
2024-04-29 18:54 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] builtin/tag.c: add --trailer option John Passaro via GitGitGadget
2024-04-29 18:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] builtin/commit.c: refactor --trailer logic John Passaro via GitGitGadget
2024-04-30 5:54 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-04-30 16:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-29 18:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] builtin/tag.c: add --trailer arg John Passaro via GitGitGadget
2024-04-30 5:54 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-04-30 16:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-30 21:48 ` John Passaro
2024-04-30 22:23 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-05-05 18:59 ` John Passaro
2024-04-29 18:54 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] po: update git-tag translations John Passaro via GitGitGadget
2024-04-29 19:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-29 19:28 ` John Passaro
2024-04-30 14:41 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] builtin/tag.c: add --trailer option John Passaro via GitGitGadget
2024-04-30 14:41 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] builtin/commit.c: remove bespoke option callback John Passaro via GitGitGadget
2024-05-02 6:27 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-04-30 14:41 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] builtin/commit.c: refactor --trailer logic John Passaro via GitGitGadget
2024-05-02 6:27 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-04-30 14:41 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] builtin/tag.c: add --trailer option John Passaro via GitGitGadget
2024-05-02 6:27 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] " Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-05 18:49 ` [PATCH v5 " John Passaro via GitGitGadget
2024-05-05 18:49 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] builtin/commit: use ARGV macro to collect trailers John Passaro via GitGitGadget
2024-05-07 15:38 ` John Passaro
2024-05-07 17:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-05 18:49 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] builtin/commit: refactor --trailer logic John Passaro via GitGitGadget
2024-05-05 18:49 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] builtin/tag: add --trailer option John Passaro via GitGitGadget
2024-05-06 5:40 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] builtin/tag.c: " Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-06 17:52 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq4jbixzg6.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=john.a.passaro@gmail.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).