[PATCH] tag: fix typo in nested tagging hint

[PATCH] tag: fix typo in nested tagging hint

[Denton Liu]

In eea9c1e78f (tag: advise on nested tags, 2019-04-04), tag was taught
to hint at the user if a nested tag is made. However, this message had a
typo and it said "The object referred to by your new is...", which was
missing a "tag" after "new". Fix this message by adding the "tag".

Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
---
Hi Junio, sorry we didn't catch this before it got merged into master.
Just a small typofix.

 builtin/tag.c  | 2 +-
 t/t7004-tag.sh | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin/tag.c b/builtin/tag.c
index 1debd3a11c..ef37dccf86 100644
--- a/builtin/tag.c
+++ b/builtin/tag.c
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ struct create_tag_options {
 };
 
 static const char message_advice_nested_tag[] =
-	N_("You have created a nested tag. The object referred to by your new is\n"
+	N_("You have created a nested tag. The object referred to by your new tag is\n"
 	   "already a tag. If you meant to tag the object that it points to, use:\n"
 	   "\n"
 	   "\tgit tag -f %s %s^{}");
diff --git a/t/t7004-tag.sh b/t/t7004-tag.sh
index e285686662..6aeeb279a0 100755
--- a/t/t7004-tag.sh
+++ b/t/t7004-tag.sh
@@ -1702,7 +1702,7 @@ test_expect_success '--points-at finds annotated tags of tags' '
 
 test_expect_success 'recursive tagging should give advice' '
 	sed -e "s/|$//" <<-EOF >expect &&
-	hint: You have created a nested tag. The object referred to by your new is
+	hint: You have created a nested tag. The object referred to by your new tag is
 	hint: already a tag. If you meant to tag the object that it points to, use:
 	hint: |
 	hint: 	git tag -f nested annotated-v4.0^{}
-- 
2.21.0.1049.geb646f7864

Re: [PATCH] tag: fix typo in nested tagging hint

[Junio C Hamano]

Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> writes:

> In eea9c1e78f (tag: advise on nested tags, 2019-04-04), tag was taught
> to hint at the user if a nested tag is made. However, this message had a
> typo and it said "The object referred to by your new is...", which was
> missing a "tag" after "new". Fix this message by adding the "tag".

Thanks.  Makes sense.  Will apply.