From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Change in .gitignore handling: intended or bug? Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 09:28:31 -0800 Message-ID: References: <1457057516.1962831.539160698.3C8B30BC@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20160304055117.GB26609@ikke.info> <1457071957.2027843.539286050.10CF8D0A@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20160304115634.GC26609@ikke.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Kevin Daudt , Charles Strahan , Git Mailing List To: Duy Nguyen X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 04 18:28:48 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1abtWx-0004Uf-7o for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 18:28:47 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758360AbcCDR2g (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2016 12:28:36 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp0.int.icgroup.com ([208.72.237.35]:58559 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757568AbcCDR2f (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2016 12:28:35 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259A148559; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 12:28:34 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=L07YqaVpBF2nQFQrZIVAB2g7oJQ=; b=xtAbnW VWwesUR74uTTV9acOg6YK0KtsRKrbPVDiJ64OrmLEzxWdRLp6EIZ9Cw1NzO28H02 q2d1RF7FxpFnwWI277nsiOAl2+0dQoC8thHePA6PU4l+qC3FmBbves7Xdj4hg1Ty mjx5iSwO/ybAKvLYxqPaFJODJtaGYgZu/SpVI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=AkxPRGEnL4RoXD5rWlD//EN3oDzA8Sf8 QcCAm+8HTe3DfYpL73uszFHIL9svBJeuuxYpu3DNSKolLVv1IRDuiXn2Xh94VUlg 5t5fAEIacHD2/oTOcRa1/kw1z0EO/iWza6jgZ4STpoQLuIRD2znlSVJHyyc33CPV Q9+deTVGVw8= Received: from pb-smtp0.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0C748558; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 12:28:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.1.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 94EB948557; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 12:28:33 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Duy Nguyen's message of "Fri, 4 Mar 2016 19:36:46 +0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 853A384C-E22E-11E5-90F5-79226BB36C07-77302942!pb-smtp0.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Duy Nguyen writes: > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Kevin Daudt wrote: >> Verified that it's different in 2.7.0, but 2.7.2 gives expected output. > > Thanks. 2.7.1 reverts the faulty commit from 2.7.0 that generated two > other regression reports before this one. I guess it's all good then > (except for the people still on 2.7.0) Are we good at 2.8.0-rc0, too? Somehow I had an impression that we queued "another attempt to do it differently" or something. ... goes and looks ... $ rungit maint status -suall ?? baz/quux/corge/wibble.txt ?? baz/quux/grault.txt ?? foo/bar.txt $ rungit master status -suall ?? baz/quux/corge/wibble.txt ?? baz/quux/grault.txt ?? baz/waldo.txt ?? foo/bar.txt ?? foo/garply.txt