From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] reftable/stack: don't call fsync(3p) unless provided
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 11:09:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq5x6b27ms.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260331-pks-reftable-portability-fixes-v1-2-46bfae55c68c@pks.im> (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Tue, 31 Mar 2026 13:26:48 +0200")
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> Users of the reftable library are expected to provide their own function
> callback in cases they want to sync(3p) data to disk via the reftable
> write options. But if no such function was provided we end up calling
> fsync(3p) directly, which may not even be available on some systems.
>
> Drop the call to fsync(3p) and rely on the callback function
> exclusively.
Hmph, reftable-backend.c seems to do
refs->write_options.fsync = reftable_be_fsync;
in its _be_init(), so this change is a no-op in the context of our
system, so this may be _safe_, but for a caller that wanted a fsync
to happen, returning to it without doing anything may be a bit
unexpected. I am wondering if it should be more like
if (!opts->fsync)
/* BUG("whoa where is your fsync callback???") */
reutrn -1;
return opts->fsync(fd);
instead.
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
> ---
> reftable/stack.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/reftable/stack.c b/reftable/stack.c
> index 1c9f21dfe1..f9ae832e3a 100644
> --- a/reftable/stack.c
> +++ b/reftable/stack.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ static int stack_fsync(const struct reftable_write_options *opts, int fd)
> {
> if (opts->fsync)
> return opts->fsync(fd);
> - return fsync(fd);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static ssize_t reftable_write_data(int fd, const void *data, size_t size)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-31 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-31 11:26 [PATCH 0/6] reftable: some more portability improvements Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-31 11:26 ` [PATCH 1/6] reftable/system: provide `REFTABLE_INLINE()` macro Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-31 18:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-31 21:12 ` René Scharfe
2026-03-31 21:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-31 22:15 ` René Scharfe
2026-03-31 22:08 ` brian m. carlson
2026-04-01 12:13 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-31 11:26 ` [PATCH 2/6] reftable/stack: don't call fsync(3p) unless provided Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-31 18:09 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-04-01 12:13 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-31 11:26 ` [PATCH 3/6] reftable/fsck: use REFTABLE_UNUSED instead of UNUSED Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-31 18:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-31 11:26 ` [PATCH 4/6] reftable/system: add abstraction to retrieve time in milliseconds Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-31 11:26 ` [PATCH 5/6] reftable/system: add abstraction to mmap files Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-31 11:26 ` [PATCH 6/6] reftable: introduce "reftable-system.h" header Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-31 18:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-04-01 12:14 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-04-01 16:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-04-02 6:16 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-04-02 7:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] reftable: some more portability improvements Patrick Steinhardt
2026-04-02 7:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] reftable: introduce "reftable-system.h" header Patrick Steinhardt
2026-04-02 7:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] reftable/stack: provide fsync(3p) via system header Patrick Steinhardt
2026-04-02 18:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-04-02 7:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] reftable/fsck: use REFTABLE_UNUSED instead of UNUSED Patrick Steinhardt
2026-04-02 7:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] reftable/system: add abstraction to retrieve time in milliseconds Patrick Steinhardt
2026-04-02 18:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-04-02 7:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] reftable/system: add abstraction to mmap files Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq5x6b27ms.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox