Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] reftable/stack: don't call fsync(3p) unless provided
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 11:09:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq5x6b27ms.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260331-pks-reftable-portability-fixes-v1-2-46bfae55c68c@pks.im> (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Tue, 31 Mar 2026 13:26:48 +0200")

Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:

> Users of the reftable library are expected to provide their own function
> callback in cases they want to sync(3p) data to disk via the reftable
> write options. But if no such function was provided we end up calling
> fsync(3p) directly, which may not even be available on some systems.
>
> Drop the call to fsync(3p) and rely on the callback function
> exclusively.

Hmph, reftable-backend.c seems to do

	refs->write_options.fsync = reftable_be_fsync;

in its _be_init(), so this change is a no-op in the context of our
system, so this may be _safe_, but for a caller that wanted a fsync
to happen, returning to it without doing anything may be a bit
unexpected.  I am wondering if it should be more like

	if (!opts->fsync)
		/* BUG("whoa where is your fsync callback???") */
		reutrn -1;
	return opts->fsync(fd);

instead.

> Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
> ---
>  reftable/stack.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/reftable/stack.c b/reftable/stack.c
> index 1c9f21dfe1..f9ae832e3a 100644
> --- a/reftable/stack.c
> +++ b/reftable/stack.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ static int stack_fsync(const struct reftable_write_options *opts, int fd)
>  {
>  	if (opts->fsync)
>  		return opts->fsync(fd);
> -	return fsync(fd);
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static ssize_t reftable_write_data(int fd, const void *data, size_t size)

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-31 18:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-31 11:26 [PATCH 0/6] reftable: some more portability improvements Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-31 11:26 ` [PATCH 1/6] reftable/system: provide `REFTABLE_INLINE()` macro Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-31 18:03   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-31 21:12   ` René Scharfe
2026-03-31 21:23     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-31 22:15       ` René Scharfe
2026-03-31 22:08   ` brian m. carlson
2026-04-01 12:13     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-31 11:26 ` [PATCH 2/6] reftable/stack: don't call fsync(3p) unless provided Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-31 18:09   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-04-01 12:13     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-31 11:26 ` [PATCH 3/6] reftable/fsck: use REFTABLE_UNUSED instead of UNUSED Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-31 18:12   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-31 11:26 ` [PATCH 4/6] reftable/system: add abstraction to retrieve time in milliseconds Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-31 11:26 ` [PATCH 5/6] reftable/system: add abstraction to mmap files Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-31 11:26 ` [PATCH 6/6] reftable: introduce "reftable-system.h" header Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-31 18:26   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-04-01 12:14     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-04-01 16:37       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-04-02  6:16         ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-04-02  7:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] reftable: some more portability improvements Patrick Steinhardt
2026-04-02  7:31   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] reftable: introduce "reftable-system.h" header Patrick Steinhardt
2026-04-02  7:31   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] reftable/stack: provide fsync(3p) via system header Patrick Steinhardt
2026-04-02 18:03     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-04-02  7:31   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] reftable/fsck: use REFTABLE_UNUSED instead of UNUSED Patrick Steinhardt
2026-04-02  7:31   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] reftable/system: add abstraction to retrieve time in milliseconds Patrick Steinhardt
2026-04-02 18:27     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-04-02  7:31   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] reftable/system: add abstraction to mmap files Patrick Steinhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq5x6b27ms.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox