Re: [PATCH] fsck: do not loop infinitely when processing packs

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> writes:

> On 2026-02-23 at 08:43:41, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
>> Typically, we don't execute `find_pack_entry()` at all when verifying
>> packfiles as we iterate through objects in packfile order. We thus don't
>> have to look up objects via their object ID, but instead we do so by
>> using their packfile offset. And this mechanism will not end up in
>> `find_pack_entry()`, and thus we wouldn't update the MRU.
>
> If you're thinking about `nth_packed_object_id`, that is index (object
> ID) order, not packfile order.  I actually made this mistake when
> writing the interop code and having that function operate in pack order
> breaks a surprising number of things in very subtle ways, notably
> generating multi-pack indexes.
>
> I will be sending a patch in the future documenting that requirement
> clearly.
>
>> I've got a couple patches in the making that'll fix this.
>
> I'm happy to drop this patch in favour of yours.  Thanks for a quick
> response.

OK, so I'll retire your fef2a726 (fsck: do not loop infinitely when
processing packs, 2026-02-22) and replace it with the four-patch
series:

26fc7b59cd t/helper: improve "genrandom" test helper
10a6762719 object-file: adapt `stream_object_signature()` to take a stream
41b42e3527 packfile: expose function to read object stream for an offset
13eb65d366 pack-check: fix verification of large objects

Thanks.