From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a4-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a4-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D4777080D for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2026 00:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.147 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768696513; cv=none; b=Shndb0NuguBmURgBQkuw3R/qK+FZR4lkauTJ5P5CDIBq1gRBhCSGRr+WVwu2Ezgihr+WVrQO3xYPXma/aHMMDILpXSl1uTwZzCdNuC3SZpFuJZTePXFNmu5pQS9U6aaz1VUgx0SQaWIY2eHlYkHvDnJbyi/GNokha++x0MOANW0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768696513; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hovuXBja2z+7/iysQEDnHngb760eIVO4/I/XayF5cws=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Z7yWIEq0sjcy6bDqYn/aWDPl2WYcoyLz6UA9aXHLvIIEsSPn1ZSwQ3jObR018QSSNXtwgL3vOWMlkR1Dff/W72pwhx3jjUI+Mn8PgB+t8xH/8HV8kqBn3uVqbG6YSreaDUU6rsnoxutwzHxzcoBSEuJjSxUvtI7Q0Bg78SCBjfk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=Gf07ni9m; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=x0B0ui0Y; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.147 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="Gf07ni9m"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="x0B0ui0Y" Received: from phl-compute-05.internal (phl-compute-05.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4614EC083E; Sat, 17 Jan 2026 19:35:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-05.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 17 Jan 2026 19:35:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1768696510; x=1768782910; bh=XadZnU3RQb xlBPv1i896PxWICiY2Y1pqzi+fgpxUoSc=; b=Gf07ni9mteAz6G/kes9KCKPjTy ceSz6F1Yii6vKgaZFBP35gYcH5+atIhqv17lxXX9ycGvkPtxTDpN0hPU74fdX8Kb 5lgO5RndnT0XCTP/X8ZDjey18Y4FSWWHHFb2VZU6RWndziGQfD7rB7FGLzvoh08Q ZkmU3AyXwoUeytPTQxivVTjLmvnctXn+CSg1owRBLOssVAd80DuTENu3WQAkZCEa XvwnPyHHMDyEE2ZuTgvvw0upWfCV9LBWaERh7oLqjgFr/DkF6H6u+gzEWSyDNP6c YZAU14A9ElLZVv2/ND8gEJGjvYOIUiBDSuFlu2BpcHOEXJ9DZBdWveXR6lIg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1768696510; x=1768782910; bh=XadZnU3RQbxlBPv1i896PxWICiY2Y1pqzi+ fgpxUoSc=; b=x0B0ui0Y4BZM6lpkyZ5LPitU8ZmON6+W6QRV15hUpBeHoqZSAHJ Ew9Axv/avKo7R9O4ZK5nGrV6hEou+rT5iZhFP1GJaD/XJ8f9NsCJPo8NkJzgYaHE VX0ARqyemVf0XkipZKy6ou2J533svqtPT9BN9lfW8aQ95LC6sYSe8mE4NBQdfhih 8vn3j4vUK1cdUlQna0nIl05195IgWtNRy5sADt7I4iVPj2mEeJeWUd/fGm1db0kA D/XNFrJgFC18pdq12B+odK5+pSLmk5SANEg6cRQwCtlPLaDJCP5rkwiIWVtFZdVZ Esq7SFf1agNyEt7Um6r3Gz4MN5bpmdA91gw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefgedrtddtgddufeefvdeiucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgesthdtredttdertdenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcu vecujfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepfeevteetjeehueegffelvdetieevffeufeejleeuffetiefggfeftdfhfeei geeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepgh hithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepiedpmhhouggvpehs mhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepkhhrihhsthhofhhfvghrhhgruhhgshgsrghkkhesfh grshhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepphhhihhllhhiphdrfihoohguuddvfees ghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtghhithhgrggughgvthesghhmrghilh drtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghp thhtohepjhhohhgrnhhnvghsrdhstghhihhnuggvlhhinhesghhmgidruggvpdhrtghpth htohepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 17 Jan 2026 19:35:10 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" Cc: "Phillip Wood" , "Josh Soref" , git@vger.kernel.org, "Johannes Schindelin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ci(*-leaks): skip the git-svn tests to save time In-Reply-To: (Kristoffer Haugsbakk's message of "Sat, 17 Jan 2026 20:02:16 +0100") References: Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2026 16:35:09 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" writes: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2026, at 19:34, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>>[snip] >> Yup, I generally like this direction, and introducing NO_P4_TESTS >> and NO_CVS_TESTS would not be so bad. Here is how it looks on top >> of Dscho's patch. >> >> --- >8 --- >> Subject: [PATCH] ci: skip CVS and P4 tests in leaks job, too >> >> Looking at the CI logs, the p4 and cvs tests account for another 24 >> minutes of test time and they offer minimal value for quite a >> similar reason as the previous step. >> >> Let's introduce and use a mechanism to skip these tests to save >> some resources. >> >> Suggested-by: Phillip Wood > > Nitpick: Using the commit ident > > Phillip Wood > > might be slightly better? I didn't even realize there are multiple addresses in play, actually. I just took it from the e-mail header's Cc: field, which my MUA copied from From: field of the message I was responding to, which was the identity of the person who suggested the change after all ;-). So, I dunno.