git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] string-list: allow passing NULL for `get_entry_index`
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2025 09:48:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq5xdsyjoz.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aL21eowK8MwmDX11@ArchLinux> (shejialuo@gmail.com's message of "Mon, 8 Sep 2025 00:40:26 +0800")

shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com> writes:

> Callers of `get_entry_index()` are required to pass a non-NULL
> `exact_match` parameter to receive information about whether an exact
> match is found. However, in some cases, callers only need the index
> position.
>
> Let's allow callers to pass NULL for the `exact_match` parameter
> when they don't need this information, reducing unnecessary variable
> declarations in calling code.
>
> Signed-off-by: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
> ---
>  string-list.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

I do not quite see the point of adding these conditional assignments
to clutter the control flow.  What benefit do these callers gain by
not having to have a throw-away int variable on the stack and
passing its address to the call chain?

> diff --git a/string-list.c b/string-list.c
> index 343cf1ca90..bf358d1a5c 100644
> --- a/string-list.c
> +++ b/string-list.c
> @@ -29,12 +29,14 @@ static size_t get_entry_index(const struct string_list *list, const char *string
>  		else if (compare > 0)
>  			left = middle + 1;
>  		else {
> -			*exact_match = 1;
> +			if (exact_match)
> +				*exact_match = 1;
>  			return middle;
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	*exact_match = 0;
> +	if (exact_match)
> +		*exact_match = 0;
>  	return right;
>  }

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-08 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-07 16:40 [PATCH 1/4] string-list: allow passing NULL for `get_entry_index` shejialuo
2025-09-08 16:48 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-09-10  0:09   ` Ben Knoble
2025-09-10  1:32     ` Junio C Hamano
2025-09-10  2:04       ` Ben Knoble
2025-09-15 12:08   ` shejialuo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-09-07 16:40 [PATCH 0/4] enhance string-list API to fix sign compare warnings shejialuo
2025-09-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 1/4] string-list: allow passing NULL for `get_entry_index` shejialuo
2025-09-09  6:22   ` Patrick Steinhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq5xdsyjoz.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shejialuo@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).