From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] string-list: allow passing NULL for `get_entry_index`
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2025 09:48:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq5xdsyjoz.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aL21eowK8MwmDX11@ArchLinux> (shejialuo@gmail.com's message of "Mon, 8 Sep 2025 00:40:26 +0800")
shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com> writes:
> Callers of `get_entry_index()` are required to pass a non-NULL
> `exact_match` parameter to receive information about whether an exact
> match is found. However, in some cases, callers only need the index
> position.
>
> Let's allow callers to pass NULL for the `exact_match` parameter
> when they don't need this information, reducing unnecessary variable
> declarations in calling code.
>
> Signed-off-by: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
> ---
> string-list.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
I do not quite see the point of adding these conditional assignments
to clutter the control flow. What benefit do these callers gain by
not having to have a throw-away int variable on the stack and
passing its address to the call chain?
> diff --git a/string-list.c b/string-list.c
> index 343cf1ca90..bf358d1a5c 100644
> --- a/string-list.c
> +++ b/string-list.c
> @@ -29,12 +29,14 @@ static size_t get_entry_index(const struct string_list *list, const char *string
> else if (compare > 0)
> left = middle + 1;
> else {
> - *exact_match = 1;
> + if (exact_match)
> + *exact_match = 1;
> return middle;
> }
> }
>
> - *exact_match = 0;
> + if (exact_match)
> + *exact_match = 0;
> return right;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-08 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-07 16:40 [PATCH 1/4] string-list: allow passing NULL for `get_entry_index` shejialuo
2025-09-08 16:48 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-09-10 0:09 ` Ben Knoble
2025-09-10 1:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-09-10 2:04 ` Ben Knoble
2025-09-15 12:08 ` shejialuo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-09-07 16:40 [PATCH 0/4] enhance string-list API to fix sign compare warnings shejialuo
2025-09-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 1/4] string-list: allow passing NULL for `get_entry_index` shejialuo
2025-09-09 6:22 ` Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq5xdsyjoz.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shejialuo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).