git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Zheng Yuting <05zyt30@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GSoC PATCH v4 0/2] smtp_auth_maybe: unified error capture and status code processing optimization
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 16:01:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq5xk76z4d.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250316050920.3264895-1-05ZYT30@gmail.com> (Zheng Yuting's message of "Sun, 16 Mar 2025 13:09:18 +0800")

Zheng Yuting <05zyt30@gmail.com> writes:

> This v4 patch series includes two improvements:
>
> 1. Unified error capture:
> Consolidate exception handling within a single eval block by introducing
> local variables to store results and error states, thereby streamlining
> code structure and enabling future extensibility.
>
> 2. Status code processing optimization:
> After catching the authentication exception, parse the three-digit status
> code in the error message, For temporary errors (4yz), only print warnings
> and return success, while for permanent errors (5xx), return failure,
> Unrecognized status codes are treated as permanent errors by default.
>
> Zheng Yuting (2):
>   Unify capture of SMTP errors
>   Error handling for SMTP status codes

Give title your commits following the project convention
(Documentation/SubmittingPatches:summary-section).

I think these two can share "sendemail:" as their "<area>:" part.

	sendemail: capture errors in an eval {} block
	sendemail: finer-grained SMTP error handling

or something like that, perhaps.

For both patches, the usual way to compose a log message of this
project is to

 - Give an observation on how the current system work in the present
   tense (so no need to say "Currently X is Y", just "X is Y"), and
   discuss what you perceive as a problem in it.

 - Propose a solution (optional---often, problem description
   trivially leads to an obvious solution in reader's minds).

 - Give commands to the codebase to "become like so".

in this order.  I got an impression that at least your 1/2 it was
unclear which part was explaining the state before the patch and
which part was about the state after the patch.

Thanks.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-17 23:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-12  6:46 [GSoC PATCH v3 0/1] Refactor SMTP Auth Error Handling Zheng Yuting
2025-03-12  6:46 ` [GSoC PATCH v3 1/1] Unify SMTP auth error handling Zheng Yuting
2025-03-13 19:58   ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-14 12:55     ` Yuting Zheng
2025-03-16  5:09     ` [GSoC PATCH v4 0/2] smtp_auth_maybe: unified error capture and status code processing optimization Zheng Yuting
2025-03-16  5:09       ` [GSoC PATCH v4 1/2] Unify capture of SMTP errors Zheng Yuting
2025-03-16  5:09       ` [GSoC PATCH v4 2/2] Error handling for SMTP status codes Zheng Yuting
2025-03-17 23:01       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-03-19  2:02       ` [GSoC PATCH v5 0/2] sendemail: improve error capture and status code handling Zheng Yuting
2025-03-19  2:02         ` [GSoC PATCH v5 1/2] sendemail: capture errors in an eval {} block Zheng Yuting
2025-03-19  2:02         ` [GSoC PATCH v5 2/2] sendemail: finer-grained SMTP error handling Zheng Yuting
2025-03-19  6:35         ` [GSoC PATCH v5 0/2] sendemail: improve error capture and status code handling Meet Soni
2025-03-21  2:51         ` [GSoC PATCH v6 0/2] send-email: " Zheng Yuting
2025-03-21  2:51           ` [GSoC PATCH v6 1/2] send-email: capture errors in an eval {} block Zheng Yuting
2025-03-21  2:51           ` [GSoC PATCH v6 2/2] send-email: finer-grained SMTP error handling Zheng Yuting
2025-03-21 15:38           ` [GSoC PATCH v6 0/2] send-email: improve error capture and status code handling Junio C Hamano
2025-03-23  2:21           ` [GSoC PATCH v7 " Zheng Yuting
2025-03-23  2:21             ` [GSoC PATCH v7 1/2] send-email: capture errors in an eval {} block Zheng Yuting
2025-03-23  2:21             ` [GSoC PATCH v7 2/2] send-email: finer-grained SMTP error handling Zheng Yuting
2025-03-24  6:00               ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-24 14:53           ` [GSoC PATCH v8 0/2] send-email: improve error capture and status code handling Zheng Yuting
2025-03-24 14:53             ` [GSoC PATCH v8 1/2] send-email: capture errors in an eval {} block Zheng Yuting
2025-03-24 14:53             ` [GSoC PATCH v8 2/2] send-email: finer-grained SMTP error handling Zheng Yuting
2025-03-25 15:34               ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-26  7:52             ` [GSoC PATCH v9 0/2] send-email: improve error capture and status code handling Zheng Yuting
2025-03-26  7:52               ` [GSoC PATCH v9 1/2] send-email: capture errors in an eval {} block Zheng Yuting
2025-03-26  7:52               ` [GSoC PATCH v9 2/2] send-email: finer-grained SMTP error handling Zheng Yuting

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq5xk76z4d.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=05zyt30@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).