From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (pb-smtp20.pobox.com [173.228.157.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D33718EBF for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 22:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.52 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721256835; cv=none; b=FKK1ZPbFHvBU7yM3/Y24Q3ODgZK834q3d7TAJbXi8WWa0B9v/ZrlsPcrpZLQrkOVPBTVMRN33vmMma7UhTQ879TADxIN4Y/p/GoNXeGz0BQk/0CCj/2+y2n3hshm84mbgf6V0wb5NUkCn2cfohycjVNSP68jHXufCmDgorizhLg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721256835; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rTGF/nmFOx2H1Uov7q+V49ibjPqqA6nFdMll1nznZQI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UH1QZTiMVu+gFWLzVFLEK9KfvLJw9AOT1ykoEu5QZsHU3p3Xc2ZCTOCZcIwfJwdsMY0++L8BvGeG3UevNeigBFEE59dOtdwWd8szaZE2S4aKgmzbjAlLbZAWyHlpRh5hUoEaDZ4s9jGHJfDqvdhF2kt268HOvoTK9+dYbfcJQB4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=LaiyOv2Z; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.52 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="LaiyOv2Z" Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92055235A1; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 18:53:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=rTGF/nmFOx2H1Uov7q+V49ibjPqqA6nFdMll1n znZQI=; b=LaiyOv2Z5jdlK6Rycd8qfVOrobszhjMCd+4VKt694oAi2PMJtBUMer 8mJ72VdpbQGowwUAPnpj2E/cP5SYIlsdMn1HUwALmm8+tXy4GmL9Oiq0omTNJmoU 9c/r4xFXWn9ZEivczwH1DzHzNj/So8P1HJzG4/cnt1kAjud1WRceQ= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89871235A0; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 18:53:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.139.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11F752359D; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 18:53:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Ramsay Jones Cc: =?utf-8?B?xJBvw6BuIFRy4bqnbiBDw7RuZw==?= Danh , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparse: ignore warning from new glibc headers In-Reply-To: <0e2c66ce-d870-4a03-a26e-a928183b9b2b@ramsayjones.plus.com> (Ramsay Jones's message of "Wed, 17 Jul 2024 23:36:46 +0100") References: <9bdac465-5f43-42de-9cad-e6c43a5a53cc@ramsayjones.plus.com> <8dd1a2c7-5b9f-4e2f-9c5a-d5d5758714e2@ramsayjones.plus.com> <0e2c66ce-d870-4a03-a26e-a928183b9b2b@ramsayjones.plus.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 15:53:47 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6E278CBE-448F-11EF-8D1D-C38742FD603B-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Ramsay Jones writes: > On 17/07/2024 20:20, Ramsay Jones wrote: > [snip] > >> (SP_EXTRA_FLAGS didn't exist then) > This is absolute rubbish, of course! ;) > > I don't know what I was thinking, but I suspect I was thinking about > the recent _APPEND variables - except they were only for CFLAGS and > LDFLAGS! Ho Hum. > > Sorry about that. That's OK. So in short, with a separate SP_EXTRA_FLAGS with "-Wno-vla", Luc's patch is a sufficient fix without any downsides, no?