From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (pb-smtp20.pobox.com [173.228.157.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3257E143C52 for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 17:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.52 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712597665; cv=none; b=Jt6Y65+S2VpTU4B6CqHJcBq0HfwfM9P8v0z6VlMEKVdFTaWG/oahV3pnSqLvWrf4at89UlN/T7TCNzDPAfqo9TEs6ZZr+sKcsGNzLkdlSx/3+SujF+/nLE/OibYiu87EvLQ9QF0So90xznhXS3X8uH9TdobcRM/NaZa+fBINZB8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712597665; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Hwnf8C/j2bL+UqD3jXLImqxvsl8NDyy2HKMo2VdnALs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lGWXotgj6sPDp5pj77LoSKB+psIU9YwaFN2rUd/GPRlkWCleBuUqtGaXfbMrUSz47wILpSW/ZDVBizha1qX52yBeha25e/VSN4FLJPIoMRizKD4gppHLTuo5Z5PWF80XgQCu/mB7btZ3pC7DriOsm6FRkV1pbSWKfjjn7k2mTC0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=JxziRSQR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.52 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="JxziRSQR" Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84E81E43B; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 13:34:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=Hwnf8C/j2bL+ UqD3jXLImqxvsl8NDyy2HKMo2VdnALs=; b=JxziRSQRjPzkCSF/p7wvKPAcyyPq lQTphQGHgM/+qK0sSUmq5fA1N76Bt3hbsOHue2p4VPqESTgeSTG+QHOxhXrZJk9h OuWHVyQN3B6AmKJ1rob5c8WOFhV2/7FrWNiH7I8ap38lO61T2akQoZlswct22sBT ll3Mdqap+ah1TYA= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B581E43A; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 13:34:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.229.118]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 894F61E433; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 13:34:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?xJBvw6BuIFRy4bqnbiBDw7RuZw==?= Danh Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] t9604: Fix test for musl libc and new Debian In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?B?IsSQb8OgbiBUcuG6p24g?= =?utf-8?B?Q8O0bmc=?= Danh"'s message of "Sun, 7 Apr 2024 08:38:10 +0700") References: <23a4298eababe54ca4b43d7b675b858605d20ec5.1712374021.git.congdanhqx@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 10:34:17 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3A54BD18-F5CE-11EE-9778-F515D2CDFF5E-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =C4=90o=C3=A0n Tr=E1=BA=A7n C=C3=B4ng Danh writes: > Well, when I tried to make this change, I first started with Olson > notation. Then I dig into the mail archive, and I see that we don't > want to depends on IANA db [5]. Then I switch to POSIX notation but > I forgot to update that. I think a PREREQ would work better? > > 5: https://lore.kernel.org/git/7v4nlvulc2.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org/ Interesting thought to use PREREQ here. As long as it will avoid tempting us into testing the feature only where we know that the feature would work, I am OK with that direction ;-) Thanks.