From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E7EC001B0 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 21:10:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232062AbjGMVKv (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:10:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35898 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229516AbjGMVKu (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:10:50 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (pb-smtp20.pobox.com [173.228.157.52]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35B7A2D43 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:10:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3EA439873; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:10:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=y6g5AbZM7Vpu6feAdmWQgd/Rvrd1AU6D7eaZjS eJ9RQ=; b=HdcQfV44SkNJErAomUA/Zolw30/o/CO21QFw/dSXg2FzpEBFdSOie6 awY62NnSRt4/+1art5e9UELb/klRnj/b98y+s4slME+RbsRC8lBWaUp8r3gdUbeb 4gKyypUJ2iYkNmHzrheV7Gm3E5QfkrO1YI/L+QavGKjxaFQOtKu4I= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE9339872; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:10:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.127.75.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43ED039871; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:10:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Linus Arver Cc: Linus Arver via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] SubmittingPatches: be more explicit References: <203ed19dd1b72a8085af05359d5a226b94fe2c7f.1688778359.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:10:43 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Linus Arver's message of "Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:03:24 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: BB7C24BC-21C1-11EE-9201-C2DA088D43B2-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Linus Arver writes: > I think what threw me off originally was the internal section link name > "[[base-branch]]". I think that could be reworded to > "base-starting-point" or similar. Yeah, I agree that it is misleading to say "branch" as if it has to already exist. starting-point would be a good phrase to include, so I would imagine base-starting-point would be an appropriate name for the inline anchor.