From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB143C004D4 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 16:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230209AbjASQYe (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2023 11:24:34 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48878 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230255AbjASQYV (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2023 11:24:21 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x62b.google.com (mail-pl1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA8AC70C67 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 08:24:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id z13so2773483plg.6 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 08:24:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BUmXDXVqMwxfZuInVrmd02QrJWeOw3966ODh9p8uOFU=; b=YhUR2cLRvXL/0JJkuVRgsZZos/27bjXyJQeDC8srOjgHgK4b3/EmsOBRkVsKlEGCH5 LVnrXiZNG7vIlTgFdWgV0yBsCQCl9ec+Mh/wBXK5I1/bm/PrhRAfMqGJtzD8QyYYgqtp 6CMJJk/u+QGKR2I1AYxzvaCfBfzv2qHCKR/70ljYlfzYkz3T1IQxujlHteUyQw7odSyK DC5n7tYqJnhRKS8opvcWgPlp7LKzm7BsNwROX51qDmtKla6KBcffx4xna91NQEcUxbET xLdABrxxg+8bSTRIl5VqFrIdWrABzzhVn7NGrNY+g60zcCCdqcByJrsJaNjXUDoGKEEt kdyA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:sender :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BUmXDXVqMwxfZuInVrmd02QrJWeOw3966ODh9p8uOFU=; b=sAuKSlW8035D1S3g/lMdaUjW5FW25uXEqjb5Afca1TXdcygMl2KTrUkY3mICdSTnKD 2ChUlSYmEvBAyGBKpkkHJDURWcptd653ssVONPHx52uwJZla61SvwgvM7XN864Z0L/Kc ngnYoPLSjWhviBSd9QZ0nh57A7hTdqzBQ/e2xAq7N454huf+9JqG8P4EpqbOarq+upSI yfFvreSKYmPBlgeDfsH9AHr0dnkolDku4z5qsM1xwEzS9YWOjEOYpBuR/9ZExPcxD3I5 qYOnVRBzcbxug9johXsBoq/hTDi/24Ba3dGzwkXVqSv6WJs8l7qNaZI6paK3/YwOc3NC QsBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krrP4XmqblEJWh56q2TVNV9jVDE9b0bSAv7INL7/V9OcnBAvVlJ wxc/Tx3B1h7TxT9a4db2CpE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXt0rVx+PTCvgyoQqDOXw3uVREFGdw74WWDgvavoVWbjufmkIf4197Koa6TTzm32Ps/ztzN52g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d506:b0:193:2fdb:db07 with SMTP id b6-20020a170902d50600b001932fdbdb07mr16246382plg.43.1674145446931; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 08:24:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (33.5.83.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.83.5.33]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i16-20020a170902cf1000b00192c5327021sm25391729plg.200.2023.01.19.08.24.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 19 Jan 2023 08:24:06 -0800 (PST) Sender: Junio C Hamano From: Junio C Hamano To: Martin =?utf-8?Q?=C3=85gren?= Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Siddharth Asthana Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-cat-file.txt: fix list continuations rendering literally References: <20230118082749.1252459-1-martin.agren@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 08:24:06 -0800 In-Reply-To: ("Martin =?utf-8?Q?=C3=85gren=22's?= message of "Thu, 19 Jan 2023 09:04:26 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Martin Ågren writes: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 at 17:23, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> Are you comparing both roff output and html output, by the way? > > Yes, I'm trying to make sure all four of > > {asciidoc, asciidoctor} x {man, html} > > agree and look good. For the manpages, I use our doc-diff script. (In > this case, I wanted an empty asciidoc diff (HEAD^ HEAD) and a good > Asciidoctor diff (s/+//-ish).) For the html, it's a bit more manual > labour, switching between files in a browser and convincing myself > everything is good, visually. > > Luckily, once both tools agree on the manpages and they look good, in my > experience, the html is probably also ok. Wonderful. Thanks for your careful work, as always.