From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDB2C38A02 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 22:50:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229975AbiJ1WuD (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Oct 2022 18:50:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56220 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230193AbiJ1Wt5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Oct 2022 18:49:57 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x636.google.com (mail-pl1-x636.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::636]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00AF815817 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 15:49:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x636.google.com with SMTP id g24so6053127plq.3 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 15:49:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=2bDVClNhgveUC1bRozuXI3D4nkXYnjJN0y7Ew6fU7QY=; b=lNKE6bhRzI+Cw9s3Y9YTXORsf9J3exeMw+jnOmIFvq9GKdEVQsoQrPXwFMZgoZOV0F eB3j47igiXE7/FG6ZroGuB2EVvpMh6CwCoBg/Qk1xLjXI+hg8nB68hjx5HqF7ArQ5eaR 0WOpDtJVmfAza1n9CEzBynCzFSW2sbCWcgRnHQmzSWiqlsHPf4TqZrf+bsn7KbMPtvdo 0q8zj0+g2TKUI9EHXe4n7bRFR0ioNnAH1lcNIGjTpOSivY+k99RKpNhvvjbbRIGmKKpJ lbmJhFUDe6WMeGvNktp7XLTvN3AiZdRcUWX1gMRAioWoAMECO6iIpbJ6vo/JXXhD6wt2 UGiQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2bDVClNhgveUC1bRozuXI3D4nkXYnjJN0y7Ew6fU7QY=; b=bAeF75UUTck9lCUxxOTD4AMIvWZ+bP5+mLtdRh1/l391UiFGcH5cK7OZk+HmE5kvne mYP0q/JnLsc/ZT0bnpQgmYmWhYFx1FZC+XHXMg3DHYAAqlJvI5/Hzr2udoFMlKEsueIU HlL/pQmDfEbdeJjiAD5QB2iSwPbZ5ujdAuq3dQiJrIRXod8R3tsLuXekp3EDx3vRIcaO mDkFSXOBRJBqTB3CHBHnGNe6ikfZOJzNoxUPG5JlR+XykbiQ5wTRjltQTRb9oZTUr41B Momgd2EAWYt86gFy6iYbq9Ab+MirsjCFggfJ2zTvrXWolEz96NPAbRErkYadkO+05ZQA k9vg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf176X6+puyn0Si+aPs8E+izjrhOfrA2REKyIDwg6G48Aqe40VT1 PgvxcLf4nDtI89TFHqoX+B5FH5nB0fw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6aFTf3Wpa7+fTMMvTrqnNpeQx5EV/wVGr+mSTn4HNbXxolH1mBCmQ3ePtgM2u7r/QC8U9N6A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1e0c:b0:213:7030:6b11 with SMTP id pg12-20020a17090b1e0c00b0021370306b11mr12101433pjb.29.1666997394290; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 15:49:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (33.5.83.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.83.5.33]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h3-20020a056a00000300b0056c0cde1a16sm3291865pfk.134.2022.10.28.15.49.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 Oct 2022 15:49:53 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Junio C Hamano From: Junio C Hamano To: "brian m. carlson" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Julien Moutinho Subject: Re: [PATCH] adjust_shared_perm(): leave g+s alone when the group does not matter References: Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 15:49:53 -0700 In-Reply-To: (brian m. carlson's message of "Fri, 28 Oct 2022 22:21:58 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "brian m. carlson" writes: > On 2022-10-28 at 21:51:42, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> "brian m. carlson" writes: >> >> > On 2022-10-28 at 21:16:09, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> Julien Moutinho reports that in an environment where directory does >> >> not have BSD group semantics and requires g+s (aka FORCE_DIR_SET_GID) >> >> but the system cripples chmod() to forbid g+s, adjust_shared_perm() >> > >> > I would personally use a different verb here because I have the >> > impression it's offensive, at least when used as a noun. Perhaps >> > "limit" or "restrict" might be more neutral, or we could pick another >> > verb which expresses our displeasure at this design (maybe "impair"?) >> > but maybe is less likely to be emotionally charged or offend. >> >> castrates? butchers? >> >> tweaks? That's quite neutral. > > I think "butchers" or "tweaks" should be fine. I might say "modifies" > as well. I've decided to weaken it a lot by phrasing it like so: ... but the system forbids chmod() to touch the g+s bit, ...