From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C587B20756 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 21:17:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750922AbdAQVRd (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:17:33 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:53706 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750952AbdAQVRc (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:17:32 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060556179D; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:16:41 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Z4SjpBlPQsARJKVJWMUsq8lf4hU=; b=euA5pV o5kPP9RAxlyu6OBPmyMCLxVVdPol3gbHeu//j5CIq4soTNUCuNPevArB5Df0ZfWh 7wDd5/2OCXhEJ7N6BOeL/RHNbnuygwqKizzFYbnVE7wiLpOgWzecZx1m0XPdzJP0 lxSfo5ZyJ5cXjK5tWM95BNce50lKQatLP3DIY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=AQXVhJJn0LxH0F+WqRS1c0UifkahPeeJ tUMDe+7VaVFLbAua3kX59ST7t5Sshm1DGWuO0Ty0LDWrxZVPM7dBnGpXP9iMjPwl 0BZKl9kt12XN7ZRMh96dtyN8TwT15LTSfX1QlhrqUZt39OVnfVS51HoKXWiJsWMh uS87JcKkzo8= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23416179C; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:16:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DBF86179B; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:16:40 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Michael Haggerty , Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] fsck: prepare dummy objects for --connectivity-check References: <20170116212231.ojoqzlajpszifaf3@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20170116213204.e7ykwowqzafkexqd@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:16:39 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20170116213204.e7ykwowqzafkexqd@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:32:04 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3CE12444-DCFA-11E6-918E-FE3F13518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > + # Drop the index now; we want to be sure that we > + # recursively notice that we notice the broken objects > + # because they are reachable from refs, not because > + # they are in the index. Rephrase to reduce redundunt "notice"s?