From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E787320756 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 02:46:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760934AbdAKCqI (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:46:08 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:60290 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754150AbdAKCqH (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:46:07 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43FCB5EBF9; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:46:06 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=DyPy0gh9MMneu08MCsZQp6tc8II=; b=xnU+WI YodXAX+SlgILPBw310X1hmSECyOERuCX5rzRJAzMjT7WyfVsy9r1u4p+x8tbg/yA PhuGiF9F1oS3IG8aJkB5oahXg5NKreqq294F91nCUlr5LcrStZxZpcgt6s7fheuV qtgXl2LVw4Dg+jevMqwnkFSjY0Vx7leHtY7BM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=IKgwy7ocdV42fMIjMmn23Ma+o3+5pEfN syo+TjkCEOkDBhSFkoe8I5bWIyoCK7sAVtanHJ86b05R5M3HN7RVaSIcEr5wwWfa 2eu8Ku0B6gsiYTaRvZPaMnsQgdsQfH7qqTlQly3vwcaMmUTmSjpHVtCOLGuI3h8+ O27eWntIbDY= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B3085EBF6; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:46:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E5D55EBF4; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:46:05 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Richard Hansen Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] diff: document the pattern format for diff.orderFile References: <20170110004031.57985-1-hansenr@google.com> <20170110004031.57985-3-hansenr@google.com> <17d48ccd-fd19-3922-8ee8-af6558d22632@google.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:46:04 -0800 In-Reply-To: <17d48ccd-fd19-3922-8ee8-af6558d22632@google.com> (Richard Hansen's message of "Tue, 10 Jan 2017 20:14:35 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 190AAF88-D7A8-11E6-A1DE-FE3F13518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Richard Hansen writes: > I was looking at the code to see how the two file formats differed and > noticed that match_order() doesn't set the WM_PATHNAME flag when it > calls wildmatch(). That's unintentional (a bug), right? It has been that way from day one IIRC even before we introduced wildmatch()---IOW it may be intentional that the current code that uses wildmatch() does not use WM_PATHNAME.