From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516D620195 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:49:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751820AbcGOQtz (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:49:55 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:61058 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751809AbcGOQty (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:49:54 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1863B2CB41; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:49:53 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=uMhXnCNS+jPXciOFZ4uaSjSaEIQ=; b=U+CMtm cxHcYODueTHJEH3+2+Z/Pae31mQnjmIK+zPQxfsmfCkOh1XVydGvM/kRJMKTNKth 8E1res20mhXcheGYOrcPYKkqoWoizKUhtLF34R9bhVYUC2dakEc3tXg8wYrD+f1X KrcBudBegoCpvKE5YX+C9G/bFjAcZe/m/0Yjg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=MT5jh4EVS5s9fM8/JhM6fF446mB/4sPu JNiy0lYdbYrlNwkUN4i4a9XinU8Hmn9tfpGDUR8q+pQViAlXd5FL9NBUu08beIl6 RidWSlvdS5d7rZf7ko4x+0PQDzRviURtZeOP52qUOHsSfNi330LGEJGRMrx71o7H jy3Dqh7vU2c= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA462CB3F; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:49:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 895852CB3E; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:49:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9?= Scharfe , Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] t5000: test tar files that overflow ustar headers References: <20160630090614.GA16725@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160630090857.GB17463@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160714182108.GB16497@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160714201018.GA18372@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160714202727.GA19101@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 09:49:50 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Fri, 15 Jul 2016 17:10:13 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 26C0BEB2-4AAC-11E6-93D0-89D312518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > So what are your plans with 2.9.2? I ask because I do not want to engineer > a 2.9.1 release just to see that 2.9.2 is out and having to spend the same > amount of time for another release ;-) Essentially unchanged from what I said in $gmane/299446 a few days ago. Merge only the t0006 workaround with lazy-prereq changes to 'maint', so that we can skip tests that are unrunnable on platforms without 64-bit long to avoid unnecessary test failures, then tag that to v2.9.2 soon enough so that you do not have to do two releases in a row (i.e. skipping v2.9.1 saying "Git for Windows skipped that one because it was not quite right; this release fixes the issue" in your v2.9.2 announcement). I couldn't do that while that t0006 fix was in flux. Now I hopefully can.