From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94DAC19DF4D for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 16:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.152 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763740910; cv=none; b=faD93kluxR0OEo2bIDjccdCuO44sQGwJpx210aqKvtkbxEBRo3jqjm3ZhvxLrxCCcVDSoDHqJvmyA5Z3O8kpaKHFMvaU8Sv14NzOY7pB+pHJNMFoFG9pkztTYLYtbEQh2jTEyk5e0It8gqVAF+z1XQVw+3eBKQWTmUFHRs+MPf4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763740910; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3moqTn48BkhfzSbzliqOKgWEHq9spB6209mXVcLpjK8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=htDi5nu0zrdJCqtSIhgGrR5O7SxFmDkddhkesO8FgwF+LBENcmjgBHWgbOLwuEHpuBGQ5ZBVC4WOfvXv+6XikupzqGisMo/xgUVcgRFI5rvIgWy+bXMalfJbyW1VZH3lgbSCXimUeq+HZxyhWIJowr7V5EcQAaU3S1bT6xm31Eg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=EQjZYjPJ; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=dp5CSZmD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.152 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="EQjZYjPJ"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="dp5CSZmD" Received: from phl-compute-05.internal (phl-compute-05.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0EBB14000D1; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 11:01:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-02 ([10.202.2.161]) by phl-compute-05.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 21 Nov 2025 11:01:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1763740907; x=1763827307; bh=ujOJxEbP9c 69hCPjiTqaLTqqLxA9KDN8CKqhK0oNzlk=; b=EQjZYjPJqIwt/hC6NXIvTuybGt WAp5PQ1H+xry3BW9pxGt+JOnxCX6AyM12yLJDVmYu60J5X+/J379YtLmx81uGk70 aep6YdKgURT0GJ3vfP7eqidJLFQqst/sGExLabeSaHCU7RoP0fTqt4lYGySh6wc+ bBE1G/fvfOHc/6TJz4JukZrzJ3mpL/8oJ2KNeShKqKg7h0SVaEYEZJAjjAFo0zlF BJQ1MapPivKt+ZAv9pCodwpcdB6VBFP1LNGdeCZMLDFngg1BUfWiQxbkjBMtDSsI 0CXtwMGoVnM3Ung/4ZoB2jEm53LtbABlSN4C09W757EVKn+DJGJMI1dThlFw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1763740907; x=1763827307; bh=ujOJxEbP9c69hCPjiTqaLTqqLxA9KDN8CKq hK0oNzlk=; b=dp5CSZmDGEyX2O+wLWcmENuyMjWcALozTz7rlrchpQ6o1WlZeiB g6dAYBvVaqsD22pxfIZlBcX+Lke51w6lrELX3Ev/z0oKC2AKVONC0H+6fCt9RUeI siyt1p3UVnI3RNdAEEFjOjN7IuDlzKZsWhuGm/MsES2gssxWXbFNkm9VPBSE7EEC zMomooDQTEUvCn/QcZABP3m7HRX2SyG4KcLybYQJW7eeTgbl4hPwNEnd3aUhuQZq 2keHUBaxFpqP8NzzgufRcMwoGy2j9ZQvSW6EpLs89x33ZUDuzYBPeBXwrLPenBIn aGeFk1x0hvteXWJ5YORvTyRBtMA35tdKWtw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdeggddvfedtfeelucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgesthdtredttdertdenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcu vecujfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepfeevteetjeehueegffelvdetieevffeufeejleeuffetiefggfeftdfhfeei geeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepgh hithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddupdhmohguvgep shhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehphhhilhhlihhprdifohhougduvdefsehgmhgrih hlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepnhgvfihrvghnsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthht ohepphhssehpkhhsrdhimhdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrd horhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepsggvnhdrkhhnohgslhgvsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghp thhtohepshhorhhgrghnohhvsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepjhhnrdgrvh hilhgrsehfrhgvvgdrfhhrpdhrtghpthhtohepmhgrrhhtihhnvhhonhiisehgmhgrihhl rdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepkhhrihhsthhofhhfvghrhhgruhhgshgsrghkkhesfhgrsh htmhgrihhlrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 11:01:46 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Phillip Wood Cc: Elijah Newren , Patrick Steinhardt , git@vger.kernel.org, "D. Ben Knoble" , Sergey Organov , =?utf-8?Q?Jean-No=C3=ABl?= AVILA , Martin von Zweigbergk , Kristoffer Haugsbakk , Karthik Nayak Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] Introduce git-history(1) command for easy history editing In-Reply-To: <3fb47b15-ed43-4137-95f8-cee97ab5e44c@gmail.com> (Phillip Wood's message of "Fri, 21 Nov 2025 14:31:38 +0000") References: <20250819-b4-pks-history-builtin-v1-0-9b77c32688fe@pks.im> <20251027-b4-pks-history-builtin-v6-0-407dd3f57ad3@pks.im> <3fb47b15-ed43-4137-95f8-cee97ab5e44c@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 08:01:45 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Phillip Wood writes: >> Granted, I think good progress is being made and perhaps the changes >> needed for the rest aren't that huge (and maybe there's more pieces >> I'm not quite understanding yet similar to the >> two-split-patches-always-summing-to-the-original), I was just a little >> surprised that my comments are summarized by "expecting a small and >> final reroll". :-) It was because I didn't think (and I still do not think) your comments are something for the immediate future, for a tool that wants to present its minimum-serviceable experimental version to users so that the users can experiment, extend it more and fix its behaviour incrementally. I may have been probably wrong, but I was getting an impression from the reviews that it is getting to there, not the feature-perfect version that needs only maintenance from now on, but a minimum-serviceable one. We could instead of collect all the I want moon and I want cheeze comments and iterate until the tool has all of them before it hits 'next', but I do not think it is often what we do to a new feature. > Yes I'm not expecting any new functionality but I am expecting a bit > more than tiny cleanup. OK. Then we'd need a non-trivial amount of work before we get there. Thanks.