From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-b4-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-b4-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCDF9202F9D for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 20:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.155 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736452817; cv=none; b=h8usQ3OIHM+dep3LL+7aKh8OgVAGgLVNG/QAp5QdO3mfliFx7N2Qhoola9G+LfjXn3rZzeotUbvzz5UCLr3XgtEg5NKIgL7oz5n8R6iP9DvOaERgn2hch0iphe2l3ZmTubuSR+a8c0a0EE7Oxz1cPpuuzX+3whyfGmHRddB8ERk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736452817; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IgvbJa3Y59ucs9wGHcT19r2wky4OR/Hm9n3MR2lgudE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bgpTkipEVbD2ofiKyBBJo9wCPUxfvdB6crzkUK+yGBzHkWGUn89S+JsAk2dlBIiszHbr18JHz1opoFx4HU0EmdLMc6q+U05vjObZTSLiQYccx6ccHB96hidz4mVM4eVJHZlq4hrZY/BeXbC+WMztSQAzuqH+egxLDP2ZDKTdvpk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=KGDKN53D; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=iPkAPzS8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.155 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="KGDKN53D"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="iPkAPzS8" Received: from phl-compute-11.internal (phl-compute-11.phl.internal [10.202.2.51]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 602252540170; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 15:00:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-11.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 09 Jan 2025 15:00:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1736452813; x=1736539213; bh=s89ZADaHewyHuRTrbswJAUspBadqig7TPzwPMvxSe+U=; b= KGDKN53DA4JGU++UQTIYyURDNPaOSX7iq0+qvb1KHRIS2hHyHNG4HWu5rTQT/Dqo 6k7aGRI0mySa073HT+qFcZo6BIVT1tizwC7TpNBVfyyQ0+Y3s3CLUK0UX7Gq+lpg eAYI2N1HsGBOg45M6Y6UPYGwKrB7VxffKJqrdK28d8i3eju6eAz98RJrf/lpluRI 4HyF99PtDFdBioFRXrc8E3hxn/6Qq/Fj2qStl+bdqvUgYJDcKW/2Okj+lOUuNnyU 5zRunz4s5MjlMoMH+4Fz8DLBLMH0siQTzDHHQM8llXVeJtaDvsLsZ/adQspQ40ip jkX9/FJWWzzSmkZ5sCWHdg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1736452813; x= 1736539213; bh=s89ZADaHewyHuRTrbswJAUspBadqig7TPzwPMvxSe+U=; b=i PkAPzS8iYSTVQDETJRMN5rcyI8dyLC8TVvDvm3KoWbJS1jH5fuW3oKLPd+L+x1bG zjo4cdTlTTfRe7bJXcuVBWs4/TP1f6cTMLIQwfeW4iHlf50z2UsMwe5yINXlbdue JixQtfT0E6Vulw5BT5pYAq0oeubx4wUPDLAh3C/X0IfYglOnyJ4SU7L3TMWvw3FA Wmf10ipdVIwUPkgHUnjAW0Pp4a3f04o1Ls2Q/YTFBYY6wf9afUgkXJi60N3oEYVr Qww67brNgAffwP2tK8GFuQ01uF1ofBroMHyhrZlSDSQI0iQYhl75LelHn79T9sXJ MwgFxll+bmKh6T44cPlWw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddrudegiedguddvkecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdp uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivg hnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvfevufgjfhffkfgfgggtgfesthekredttder jeenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcuvecujfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosg hogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephfetvdejheduheegleehfeeivedtgeel fedvffdtvedtudffieekieeijedvlefhnecuffhomhgrihhnpehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrgh enucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgihht shhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeeipdhmohguvgepshhmth hpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehmrghrthhinhdrrghgrhgvnhesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdp rhgtphhtthhopehgihhtghhithhgrggughgvthesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtth hopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepphhssehpkhhs rdhimhdprhgtphhtthhopehjohhhrghnnhgvshdrshgthhhinhguvghlihhnsehgmhigrd guvgdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 15:00:12 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Martin =?utf-8?Q?=C3=85gren?= Cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Patrick Steinhardt , Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] GIT-VERSION-GEN: allow it to be run in parallel In-Reply-To: ("Martin =?utf-8?Q?=C3=85gren=22's?= message of "Thu, 9 Jan 2025 19:33:42 +0100") References: Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 12:00:11 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Martin Ågren writes: >> ... attempts to remedy this in git/git were unsuccessful, see e.g. >> https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.216.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/ > ... > You could use "$OUTPUT"."$$"+ to restore this. That of course > invalidates your remark about "Incidentally, ..." above, but might give > this fix a tiny bit less chance of regressing something somewhere? Thanks for being careful. My reading of that old thread cited there tells me that the reason that previous one failed was mostly because it wasn't being self consistent and only touched the use of "+" in the Documentation directory but not what the top-level Makefile did, and also because it did not adjust .gitignore patterns, so it is good that somebody actually read the cited thread and made sure this time we do better. Again, I was not opposed to moving from "+" to something else that is equally short-and-sweet, and I still am not ("~" is a fine suffix for this kind of thing, for example). But if we are aiming for a short-term fix, I think your ".$$+" may make the most sense. Thanks.