From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] doc: option value may be separate for valid reasons
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:49:16 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq7c8r7wab.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cTCiyc-8GnEEKZvDTAvmrXNrfJ-Uq4=7TCv21UgoiKAZw@mail.gmail.com> (Eric Sunshine's message of "Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:35:59 -0500")
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 10:14 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Even though `git help cli` recommends users to prefer using
>> "--option=value" over "--option value", there can be reasons why
>> giving them separately is a good idea. One reason is that shells do
>> not perform tilde expansion for `--option=~/path/name` but they
>> expand `--options ~/path/name` just fine.
>>
>> This is not a problem for many options whose option parsing is
>> properly written using OPT_FILENAME(), because the value given to
>> OPT_FILENAME() is tilde-expanded internally by us, but some commands
>> take a pathname as a mere string, which needs this trick to have the
>> shell help us.
>>
>> I think the reason we originally decided to recommend the stuck form
>> was because an option that takes an optional value requires you to
>> use it in the stuck form, and it is one less thing for users to
>> worry about if they get into the habit to always use the stuck form.
>> But we should be discouraging ourselves from adding an option with
>> an optional value in the first place, and we might want to weaken
>> the current recommendation.
>>
>> In any case, let's describe this one case where it is necessary to
>> use the separate form, with an example.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
>
> v2 looks good to me.
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-25 4:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-24 9:43 [PATCH] doc: option value may be separate for valid reasons Junio C Hamano
2024-11-24 23:54 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-11-25 3:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2] " Junio C Hamano
2024-11-25 3:35 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-11-25 4:49 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq7c8r7wab.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).