From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>,
stolee@gmail.com, phillip.wood123@gmail.com, me@ttaylorr.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] sequencer: comment checked-out branch properly
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 10:18:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq7c982aoi.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqikss2b7l.fsf@gitster.g> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Wed, 13 Nov 2024 10:07:10 +0900")
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com writes:
>
>> diff --git a/t/t3400-rebase.sh b/t/t3400-rebase.sh
>> index 09f230eefb2..f61a717b190 100755
>> --- a/t/t3400-rebase.sh
>> +++ b/t/t3400-rebase.sh
>> @@ -456,4 +456,20 @@ test_expect_success 'rebase when inside worktree subdirectory' '
>> )
>> '
>>
>> +test_expect_success 'git rebase --update-ref with core.commentChar and branch on worktree' '
>> + test_when_finished git branch -D base topic2 &&
>> + test_when_finished git checkout main &&
>> + test_when_finished git branch -D wt-topic &&
>> + test_when_finished git worktree remove wt-topic &&
>> + git checkout main &&
>> + git checkout -b base &&
>> + git checkout -b topic2 &&
>> + test_commit msg2 &&
>> + git worktree add wt-topic &&
>> + git checkout base &&
>> + test_commit msg3 &&
>> + git checkout topic2 &&
>> + git -c core.commentChar=% rebase --update-refs base
>> +'
>
> Can we improve this test a bit to give it more visibility into the
> breakage?
>
> I am sure that the internal machinery gets confused because it wants
> to skip commented out lines assuming '%' is used for comments, and
> fails to skip lines that are commented with '#', but it is a bit too
> opaque how this would break without the fix. Perhaps add a line or
> two of a comment to the test to describe what the expected mode of
> failure is?
Something like "a line commented-out with '#' in the list of
instructions used internally by "rebase" is not recognised as a
comment and you'd get an error that says '#' is not a valid
instruction", perhaps.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-13 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-23 17:27 [PATCH] sequencer: comment checked-out branch properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-10-23 18:44 ` Taylor Blau
2024-10-23 19:53 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-10-31 16:30 ` Phillip Wood
2024-10-31 17:25 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-10-31 20:30 ` phillip.wood123
2024-10-31 9:58 ` Phillip Wood
2024-10-31 10:07 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-10-31 16:30 ` Phillip Wood
2024-10-23 20:43 ` Taylor Blau
2024-10-23 20:51 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-11-12 10:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] sequencer: comment out properly in todo list kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-12 10:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] sequencer: comment checked-out branch properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-13 1:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-13 1:18 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-11-13 14:47 ` phillip.wood123
2024-11-13 22:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-24 20:02 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-11-12 10:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] sequencer: comment `--reference` subject line properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-13 1:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-13 14:48 ` phillip.wood123
2024-11-13 23:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-12 10:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] sequencer: comment commit messages properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-13 1:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-13 14:49 ` phillip.wood123
2024-11-24 19:58 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-11-13 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] sequencer: comment out properly in todo list Junio C Hamano
2024-11-24 20:01 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-11-24 20:56 ` [PATCH v3 " kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-24 20:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] sequencer: comment checked-out branch properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-24 20:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] sequencer: comment `--reference` subject line properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-24 20:56 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] sequencer: comment commit messages properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-25 10:07 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] sequencer: comment out properly in todo list phillip.wood123
2024-11-25 10:52 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-11-25 14:36 ` phillip.wood123
2024-11-25 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 " kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-25 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] sequencer: comment checked-out branch properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-25 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] sequencer: comment `--reference` subject line properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-25 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] sequencer: comment commit messages properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-26 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] sequencer: comment out properly in todo list Junio C Hamano
2024-11-26 11:24 ` Phillip Wood
2024-11-27 12:39 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq7c982aoi.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=code@khaugsbakk.name \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).