From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76EDE1C9DFF for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 20:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726691642; cv=none; b=mPV86Wc2L4jFgMFGsGXwit1mrJIcymBSSBssOJVPP4x+FVHV4R2P1jI60CAyBvcVnrEchPeAesDJfwFlL9ZJj4wyx2JfeE0NPtVv+l1Kwcp0ZSgtepiOQ3m94doLGCnpo2Hasz/br5sxfyLcDAr+vvDNnrq/NlLdhN1zIy6VhCM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726691642; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0lqVm+P/A6ay4cuVjktGkIznAbR0GT3ySNpa1pZ2txM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kf04LvLa+JHtistaa/Y65CXkxzluwcdM03RKpqMzkNABm7PvqvMjQcDTMWUU2Hd98/eYusPeE2f5DH4n1D6u2pVgJ53Cf2Niw17xy3fUpGB+VJ+btdp8Fq5yoVi2SsNwNH+0ATMfdD4UOeDXrEtm+HlK2rOHtrlLdB14Xfn2flU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=x6FJ0e7g; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="x6FJ0e7g" Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43DC11945A; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 16:33:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gitster@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=0lqVm+P/A6ay4cuVjktGkIznAbR0GT3ySNpa1p Z2txM=; b=x6FJ0e7gUmtULeCulcLQ8QMRs7ABy6WiLttKBi5Ob411lbHq+7ZZx2 /Aqk8gDMPVkbafB75le1yvLuTynP54TZ3AorFMoOFkNVBQhmZsik8IeGgyWvxiDa whhlQf9Kwz5gi9mtzxqEkYeca6LpFIrxHVrxy5lDfIKtayRBy1iks= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3B919459; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 16:33:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gitster@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.108.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A2D2519458; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 16:33:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gitster@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Patrick Steinhardt Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Taylor Blau Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2024, #06; Mon, 16) In-Reply-To: (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Tue, 17 Sep 2024 12:05:31 +0200") References: Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 13:33:57 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 551BB6E2-75FD-11EF-B30F-9B0F950A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Patrick Steinhardt writes: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 07:02:45PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> * ps/reftable-exclude (2024-09-16) 7 commits >> - refs/reftable: wire up support for exclude patterns >> - reftable/reader: make table iterator reseekable >> - t/unit-tests: introduce reftable library >> - Makefile: stop listing test library objects twice >> - builtin/receive-pack: fix exclude patterns when announcing refs >> - refs: properly apply exclude patterns to namespaced refs >> - Merge branch 'cp/unit-test-reftable-stack' into ps/reftable-exclude >> (this branch is used by ps/reftable-alloc-failures.) >> >> The reftable backend learned to more efficiently handle exclude >> patterns while enumerating the refs. >> >> Will merge to 'next'? >> source: > > I was waiting for Taylor's review as he has written the original logic > for the "files" backend. It came in this morning, and after some back > and forth on the second version he agreed that the current version looks > good, so this is ready to be merged from my point of view. Thanks, both.