From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F7BC433F5 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 16:37:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C653610A6 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 16:37:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230056AbhINQjH (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:39:07 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:58062 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230265AbhINQiw (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:38:52 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE9EEE4FF; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:37:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=R894zY2BYMjL 73JeTxmUkOfvRENTPgwVl45ss+exvv4=; b=hL6hXN4SyaHz0Tzdg1Zb8BaY0d0b FgUIVf9FfouwVLNX8d1vNw626bXwEoebOHRnKih/jBcPrNlHxjwbOEl3XDx+SZuX 0mDBo8yQvPSMn3AibYHK4HUwoNpgC0hS2224ryKrmxvWeulEyEhTPJy4V4gP49b2 eiocgRJL91PW2CE= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5281EE4FE; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:37:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.73.10.127]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 335F1EE4FD; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:37:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Carlo Marcelo Arenas =?utf-8?Q?Bel=C3=B3n?= Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, bagasdotme@gmail.com, johannes.schindelin@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] windows: allow building without NO_UNIX_SOCKETS References: <20210913085600.35506-1-carenas@gmail.com> <20210914072600.11552-1-carenas@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:37:32 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20210914072600.11552-1-carenas@gmail.com> ("Carlo Marcelo Arenas =?utf-8?Q?Bel=C3=B3n=22's?= message of "Tue, 14 Sep 2021 00:25:57 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0F861E10-157A-11EC-99A8-CD991BBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Carlo Marcelo Arenas Bel=C3=B3n writes: > Eventhough NO_UNIX_SOCKETS was specifically added to support Windows, > it might not be necessary in the future, because Windows added support > for Unix Sockets in late 2017. Thanks. I found that this round was a pleasant read. Will queue, and let's merge it down to 'next' soonish.