From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F45C11F65 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 01:42:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC87F61CC9 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 01:42:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231920AbhF2BpK (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 21:45:10 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:64001 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231768AbhF2BpJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 21:45:09 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688ABC54C4; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 21:42:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=sasl; bh=b3L0r2s8hFl8Pg3Hbs8yhPVRp74fvMfm6O8p4owHhCc=; b=jezt oxaQNwnipL2gCt0WWaQR7iYC4y3abKcPlmH+w0au9fLsZ1mb6AbhOhfZJs8inOUi pc3aq75p7kJ4a3PzDHWVlOjC8Elj5RMHmufNjyon0L4mQbr51MKPIBtUKnaRYPLK amvt5PjNKFf3fgjGDOQvDtO6gEbF7gpe/NtRKGg= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56576C54C3; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 21:42:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.3.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9949EC54C2; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 21:42:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , git@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Contreras , Phillip Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] help: colorize man pages if man.color=true under less(1) References: Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 18:42:41 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4B0A7A80-D87B-11EB-9C58-8B3BC6D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > .... But from your > description (and I think the code matches this), doing: > > [color] > ui = false > man = true > > would still disable the man-colors. So there's no way to enable this > feature without enabling colors everywhere else. I think it should > simply be independent of color.ui (with the exception that it may > eventually use it as a fallback like all the other color.* booleans, > _if_ we want to move it to default-to-on). That matches my perception. Thanks.