From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC5DC433B4 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 12:50:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255CA61040 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 12:50:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230245AbhEDMvF (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2021 08:51:05 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:54920 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230361AbhEDMvF (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2021 08:51:05 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2C5C69A9; Tue, 4 May 2021 08:50:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=9iMvOuraaHTP LSyA9EJwBtYgLochqU7OHTyJkQHiTOE=; b=uwCb97qiFAPml3wYIRbxfD5wBGeF iZFhWnRx/Sui2LshuCfJoxbtYY7NskrIlzSn6Xss/Yl4olPpzuqIL/xe8Y0xqvfR 8GZ9LvhG52J6Aet1D76FvLtske2/LbLyCYdXnywTvlDIapb+pfdOx5C2BBvwU+uf NfLlORKntZ5sG/0= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39E4C69A7; Tue, 4 May 2021 08:50:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84ED1C69A5; Tue, 4 May 2021 08:50:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: Git List , Eric Sunshine , "brian m. carlson" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] CodingGuidelines: explicitly allow "local" for test scripts References: <877dkgxk9p.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <87czu6wuf3.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 21:50:07 +0900 In-Reply-To: <87czu6wuf3.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsOGdmFyIEFy?= =?utf-8?B?bmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Tue, 04 May 2021 14:27:24 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 41F34352-ACD7-11EB-981A-74DE23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason writes: > It's effectively synonymous with saying "we still want to support git o= n > platforms that are so broken they can't even run a single test in our > test suite". Not really. Those on such a platform would (rightly) say that it is the test suite that is broken and out of compliance.