From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57271C282DD for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 19:57:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27CA1206DB for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 19:57:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="YMI0dnbK" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728457AbgAGT5p (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2020 14:57:45 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:51098 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728379AbgAGT5o (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2020 14:57:44 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9AC097F4A; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 14:57:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=pFA/Uu7L4rSulELAAHGRRhZZnAw=; b=YMI0dn bKuR/YsdFd7Hb+Kj4u5rs9nrN7oLahaP4XM5a39vVz17lLNpe8b5bMBoxYMoQm5l TlUjy4tHk18TtcdjtV9X4aUPnI+6Jw6IfvwBWMP5URsDOsfRAIjQqesaNkyOUPgl Gz0dD71CVPKca0cADlyGbPHi9hvKZ7hfsYTZs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=uhq567q+oUvz7Q2IktrS3d+6dA3b464n mrikOYY56zxDUvImlxD7Ig+wBw2KGG7h9kKl/BzmE0iBOm1aJ2jagHqQnB30CgQv pjmm/ySpPOhXKu3DhFLuOE/oMHlsRAr09oisfxB+PNH6uUcdy6YkNzzCU02ZFIpa 9PvzXGp5RS0= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C199197F49; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 14:57:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8554B97F48; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 14:57:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Liam Huang via GitGitGadget , Liam Huang , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Update imap-send.c, fix incompatibilities with OpenSSL 1.1.x References: Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 11:57:36 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Tue, 7 Jan 2020 19:48:16 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F4CCB07A-3187-11EA-B707-8D86F504CC47-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > I am afraid that I do not know of any means to teach GitGitGadget to make > that call whether it has seen a consensus. > > And I fear that you are asking me to punt back that decision to > contributors, i.e. put a lot of the burden of knowing how Git > contributions are expected to progress _away_ from GitGitGadget. Yes, and that is why I am giving review comments to contributors to teach how the development community works. > Of course, I can teach GitGitGadget to not Cc: you. Like, always. Not sure > that you would like that any better because you would not even be Cc:ed > once consensus was reached. That would actually be better. Somebody in the discussion thread would probably say "This is good enough---send it to the maintainer" when the topic is ready.