Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] gpg-interface: add minTrustLevel as a configuration option

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Hans Jerry Illikainen <hji@dyntopia.com> writes:

>> I wonder if the code becomes less misleading if we either (1)
>> renamed 'next' to a name that hints more strongly that it is not the
>> 'next' line but the end of the current token we are interested in,
>> or (2) get rid of the pointer and instead counted size of the
>> current token we are interested in, or perhaps both?  
>
> Yeah the name 'next' does seem a bit counter-intuitive when used in
> relation to 'line'.  Looking through the function it seems that both (1)
> and (2) would work.

Thanks for thinking the code a bit more than necessary for the
purpose of this topic.  Let's leave such a clean-up outside the
scope of this topic, but perhaps a #leftoverbits marker may help us
remember it as something we could do when we have nothing else
better to do ;-)