Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,  Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
	 Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>,
	 Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/10] pack-objects: introduce '--stdin-packs=follow-reachable'
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 19:09:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq8q8068f7.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aj8cOhH6hGVZIFft@nand.local> (Taylor Blau's message of "Fri, 26 Jun 2026 20:41:30 -0400")

Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:

>> > +	if (packed_object_info(p, ofs, &oi) < 0)
>> > +		return 0;
>> > +	if (type != OBJ_COMMIT && type != OBJ_TAG)
>> > +		return 0;
>>
>> We do not care about non commits, non tags.
>
> This should not be an &&, but rather an ||. We only want to handle
> objects which are either commits *or* tags via this function.

My comment above did not mean to say anything is wrong in the code;
I was just thinking aloud.  We return for blob or tree because they
are not commit and they are not tag.  If we say "||" then we return
for everybody, because anything that is a commit (failing the LHS of
the "||") cannot be a tag (satisfying the RHS of the "||").


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-27  2:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-26 19:02 [RFC PATCH 00/10] repack: combine '--geometric' and '--cruft' Taylor Blau
2026-06-26 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] repack: unconditionally exclude non-kept packs Taylor Blau
2026-06-26 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] repack: extract `locate_existing_pack()` helper Taylor Blau
2026-06-26 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] repack: mark geometric progression of packs as retained Taylor Blau
2026-06-26 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] repack: teach MIDX retention about geometric rollups Taylor Blau
2026-06-26 21:28   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-27  0:43     ` Taylor Blau
2026-06-26 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] repack: delete geometric packs via existing_packs Taylor Blau
2026-06-26 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] repack-geometry: drop unused redundant-pack removal Taylor Blau
2026-06-26 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] pack-objects: extract `stdin_packs_add_all_pack_entries()` Taylor Blau
2026-06-26 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] pack-objects: introduce '--stdin-packs=follow-reachable' Taylor Blau
2026-06-26 21:39   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-27  0:41     ` Taylor Blau
2026-06-27  2:09       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-06-27  2:26         ` Taylor Blau
2026-06-26 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] pack-objects: support '--refs-snapshot' with 'follow-reachable' Taylor Blau
2026-06-26 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] repack: support combining '--geometric' with '--cruft' Taylor Blau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq8q8068f7.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox