Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Chen Linxuan <me@black-desk.cn>
Cc: Chen Linxuan via B4 Relay <devnull+me.black-desk.cn@kernel.org>,
	git@vger.kernel.org,
	 Kristoffer Haugsbakk <kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com>,
	 Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>,
	Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] includeIf: add "worktree" condition for matching working tree path
Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 18:24:48 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq8q97et9b.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC1kPDPbyxs-aTrAOi_PNTZF7EApG31iLYwm+Eddpeh2hT8a-w@mail.gmail.com> (Chen Linxuan's message of "Mon, 25 May 2026 17:00:23 +0800")

Chen Linxuan <me@black-desk.cn> writes:

> On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 3:31 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>
>> Chen Linxuan via B4 Relay <devnull+me.black-desk.cn@kernel.org>
>> writes:
>>
>> > Changes in v5:
>> > - Fix Windows CI failure: use `**` glob pattern instead of `/` in the
>> >   "worktree without repository" tests, since `/` as a path pattern is
>> >   Unix-specific and does not match Windows paths.
>>
>> Would it have worked if you used something like "[/\\].path",
>> instead of "/.path", to cover directory delimiters for both systems?
>>
>> I am not asking to make further changes.  I am trying to understand
>> what the extent of the problem was.
>
> The root cause is that on Windows,
> strbuf_realpath() returns paths with a drive letter prefix (e.g.
> D:/a/git/...), which does not start with /.

Ahh, OK, so the "Changes in v5" description was misleading.

This exchange suggests that the use of **/.path in the test deserves
some in-code comment to explain why we use such an unusual and loose
construct.

Thanks.


      reply	other threads:[~2026-05-25  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-25  3:20 [PATCH v5 0/2] includeIf: add "worktree" condition for matching working tree path Chen Linxuan via B4 Relay
2026-05-25  3:20 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] config: refactor include_by_gitdir() into include_by_path() Chen Linxuan via B4 Relay
2026-05-25  3:20 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] config: add "worktree" and "worktree/i" includeIf conditions Chen Linxuan via B4 Relay
2026-05-25  7:31 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] includeIf: add "worktree" condition for matching working tree path Junio C Hamano
2026-05-25  9:00   ` Chen Linxuan
2026-05-25  9:24     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq8q97et9b.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=devnull+me.black-desk.cn@kernel.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com \
    --cc=me@black-desk.cn \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox