From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-b6-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-b6-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B546779CD for ; Mon, 11 May 2026 03:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.149 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778468733; cv=none; b=V0OlmBptUI2AEdxWm4ClFHhWVYiDH7v/EXXALT1JwiX95Ifh/y/FF5NvCO2QC7iqSHstEcEqOI/LLP8WO6/JTOn9H0cQ5qc0TGvqMuY84eXVxd2TNjhIvbr6YOpmhPwVjHnOnaKeIjUdRx6+zSRg63OoJDnltPehCefp3AIYoRg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778468733; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ksLY/MpG9gtLtbAzdu9UVUOanWz4PeKo2a4sc+KXeU4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FHJCiauyfDBzEdpObv65dwU0T1QHKFEkjxDcREt3RbO+3yOB68aGiVChUKKLlyobmcb0NHvpzdE+fcPk4As+HkIt0q/eNWFZhJ5EiVbvv1xHXUcEKo5FCN4I4686TUmROIJBWidrZm44hbpdCMuIs7G+1HaD+rlmk6Z56/r2kTA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=tn+dK6mb; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=PQUGex6B; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.149 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="tn+dK6mb"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="PQUGex6B" Received: from phl-compute-02.internal (phl-compute-02.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816491D000D5; Sun, 10 May 2026 23:05:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-02 ([10.202.2.161]) by phl-compute-02.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 10 May 2026 23:05:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1778468731; x=1778555131; bh=xkZp1HC3Cy CzmbccNn6xkmqY7jIYkGLBHNwt0VUNytI=; b=tn+dK6mbzw540RcSiGD94L8Ud4 vu8Y29EGys7LlDR3YnvEwXGNi+TVc1dSd4ZWvp7rHax6o4qv6Kgi86JEMueHovYm wJGm+he5vpNDvKGKSTi/18+n4irjW3V7iJVGLQjiNmMkBRZu6PeWVavMlypzJRka 45rleUevJEexKRnCoQlBGbvqBtbq2D/Hf+f6LpHjhA0joRB6wekoVBBoyn55VB48 bHP9IGHM0cno2UpDf8WtdGjobBFrhwEFXzsB2joH137kfU1VvE3lWU3NabFxe3Qa eitq4WD/NnqTl6gqgshsIEcHbtFl8ic//U4+aGOG54iP/0Nu5N/wNkAZwWDA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1778468731; x=1778555131; bh=xkZp1HC3CyCzmbccNn6xkmqY7jIYkGLBHNw t0VUNytI=; b=PQUGex6Bo89ZWziHYI/lyTgm/V43Vuw3QXCXoJG62CEFFWwhRBo MTh7XQ6wodLtTVRSuh8gmlzHBYhYbSbob/uf6zV7l6BEufWRQNFTfxTKLm0VAhbp /Nes07Dg9QvVYgeyjQwY62FhtRYYUqtkbFPxqaZYru+csqqCP63liVnNZvhfyaWy 8Zo/B12XWJBBgIYocOD4zmzdwdYDSZcckA1isTOOF25ckW/4UvlM9+RhoJUaJSz5 J1tanb/YJ16dG/ey8IUAQNkeMRKzOmImxfZ6xDE7YNfizHFfDfofBbi2KIA5v814 e2KiWBd/Xvcvg2bwdrISMvht8RT00uEEqFA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefhedrtddtgdduudejkeeiucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgesthdtredttdertdenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcu vecujfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepfeevteetjeehueegffelvdetieevffeufeejleeuffetiefggfeftdfhfeei geeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepgh hithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepudefpdhmohguvgep shhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehsthholhgvvgesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtph htthhopehmvgesthhtrgihlhhorhhrrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhgihhtghgr ughgvghtsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnh gvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopegthhhrihhsthhirghnrdgtohhuuggvrhesghhmrghi lhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehjohhhrghnnhgvshdrshgthhhinhguvghlihhnsehgmh igrdguvgdprhgtphhtthhopehjohhhnhgtrghikeeisehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghp thhtohepkhgrrhhthhhikhdrudekkeesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehkrh hishhtohhffhgvrhhhrghughhssggrkhhksehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 10 May 2026 23:05:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Derrick Stolee Cc: Taylor Blau , Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, christian.couder@gmail.com, johannes.schindelin@gmx.de, johncai86@gmail.com, karthik.188@gmail.com, kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com, newren@gmail.com, peff@peff.net, ps@pks.im Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] pack-objects: integrate --path-walk and some --filter options In-Reply-To: <07b36bd8-376b-4a98-a735-0c0f75452c24@gmail.com> (Derrick Stolee's message of "Tue, 5 May 2026 15:44:56 -0400") References: <07b36bd8-376b-4a98-a735-0c0f75452c24@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 12:05:29 +0900 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Derrick Stolee writes: > On 5/5/2026 3:01 PM, Taylor Blau wrote: >> On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 12:18:28PM -0400, Derrick Stolee wrote: >> ... >> I think this is a consequence of us not sending directly-referenced >> blobs with `--filter=blob:none` when running the filters through >> `--path-walk`. Something like: >> ... > Thanks for this suggestion. I got pulled away from my investigation, so > wasn't to this point yet. >> fixes t5310 for me. I haven't looked into any of the other failures yet >> since you mentioned that you're looking into them, but let me know if >> you want to tag-team any of these. >> >> (As a related side-note, I noticed that GIT_TEST_PACK_PATH_WALK=1 is not >> currently in the TEST-vars CI build. I'm not sure if there are >> historical reasons for leaving it out, but if not I think it would be >> worthwhile to add it.) > I think the initial idea was that the feature was too niche to add it to > the CI builds right away. Your series is going to make it a lot more > important, so adding this to CI builds may be valuable. Should I expect a new [v3] iteration anytime soon? Not getting antsy, but just going through the "What's cooking" report to see if there are things I should immediately advance. Thanks.