Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,  Michael Montalbo <mmontalbo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] parse-options: clarify PARSE_OPT_NONEG does not reject negative numbers
Date: Sun, 10 May 2026 07:01:15 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq8q9sb5uc.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05ff821e6ffec02a3bfc5aef542592de6a7add76.1778022144.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget's message of "Tue, 05 May 2026 23:02:24 +0000")

"Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

> From: Michael Montalbo <mmontalbo@gmail.com>
>
> The name "NONEG" can be misread as "no negative [values]" when it
> actually means "no [boolean] negation" (the --no-* form).
>
> When --inter-hunk-context and -U/--unified were converted from a
> custom parser to OPT_INTEGER_F with PARSE_OPT_NONEG in d473e2e0e8
> and 16ed6c97cc, the implicit rejection of negative values (via
> isdigit() in the old opt_arg() parser) was silently lost. The
> previous commits in this series fix the resulting bugs.

I do not think _NONEG has anything to do with the bug.  It was
purely to reject --no-unified and --no-inter-hunk-context.

And there was no change to remove PARSE_OPT_NONEG from anywhere and
use OPT_UNSIGNED instead to fix any of the bugs fixed in this
series, ...

>
> Add a clarifying note to the flag documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Montalbo <mmontalbo@gmail.com>
> ---
>  parse-options.h | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/parse-options.h b/parse-options.h
> index 706de9729f..c0a3a3dcae 100644
> --- a/parse-options.h
> +++ b/parse-options.h
> @@ -116,7 +116,10 @@ typedef int parse_opt_subcommand_fn(int argc, const char **argv,
>   *   mask of parse_opt_option_flags.
>   *   PARSE_OPT_OPTARG: says that the argument is optional (not for BOOLEANs)
>   *   PARSE_OPT_NOARG: says that this option does not take an argument
> - *   PARSE_OPT_NONEG: says that this option cannot be negated
> + *   PARSE_OPT_NONEG: says that this option cannot be negated (i.e.
> + *                   prevents --no-<option> boolean form). Does not reject
> + *                   negative numeric values like --option=-1. Use
> + *                   OPT_UNSIGNED for options that must be non-negative.

... I do not think the two additional sentences are warranted.  Stop
at clarifying what negated _means_ (i.e., rejects "--no-<option>"),
without adding what negated does _not_ mean.


>   *   PARSE_OPT_HIDDEN: this option is skipped in the default usage, and
>   *                     shown only in the full usage.
>   *   PARSE_OPT_LASTARG_DEFAULT: says that this option will take the default

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-09 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-05 23:02 [PATCH 0/4] diff: reject negative context values Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget
2026-05-05 23:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] diff: reject negative values for --inter-hunk-context Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget
2026-05-05 23:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] diff: reject negative values for -U/--unified Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget
2026-05-05 23:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] xdiff: guard against negative context lengths Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget
2026-05-05 23:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] parse-options: clarify PARSE_OPT_NONEG does not reject negative numbers Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget
2026-05-09 22:01   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-05-10  2:41     ` Michael Montalbo
2026-05-10  1:01 ` [PATCH 0/4] diff: reject negative context values Junio C Hamano
2026-05-10  2:46   ` Michael Montalbo
2026-05-12 18:10 ` [PATCH v2 " Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget
2026-05-12 18:10   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] diff: reject negative values for --inter-hunk-context Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget
2026-05-12 18:10   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] diff: reject negative values for -U/--unified Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget
2026-05-12 18:10   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] xdiff: guard against negative context lengths Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget
2026-05-12 18:10   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] parse-options: clarify what "negated" means for PARSE_OPT_NONEG Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget
2026-05-13  1:16   ` [PATCH v2 0/4] diff: reject negative context values Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq8q9sb5uc.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=mmontalbo@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox